Environmental quality standards for agricultural land in China: What should be improved on derivation methodology?
- PMID: 36352708
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116334
Environmental quality standards for agricultural land in China: What should be improved on derivation methodology?
Abstract
Soil pollution has caused increasingly widespread attention in China. The environmental risk threshold of pollutants is a yardstick to measure soil environmental quality. For decades, plenty of research on soil environmental quality standards (SEQSs) has been carried out, providing scientific basis for the investigation and supervision of soil environmental quality. This paper summaries the development of SEQSs in China, the corresponding influencing factors and methodology of SEQSs derivation. In the current version of SEQSs (GB15618-2018), the thresholds of soil pollutants are derived by the methods of environmental risk assessment, which are more methodologically scientific than geochemical method and ecological effect method used in the previous version (GB15618-1995). Abundant toxicology data on related species is required for risk assessment of soil pollution using extrapolation; however, basic toxicological data is insufficient and few valid data is available at present. Besides, the inadequate consideration on influencing factors for the derivation of soil pollutant threshold would affect the scientificity and rationality of SEQSs, such as biotic factors (species type, test endpoint etc.) and abiotic factors (aging effect, leaching effect, synergistic or antagonistic effects of elements etc.). These problems should be paid close attention in future research on soil environmental quality standards. The contents summarized in this review may provide reference for decision-making on supervision of soil environmental quality and point out important directions for future studies.
Keywords: Derivation methodology; SSD; Soil environmental quality standards; Soil pollution.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
[Derivation of the Thresholds of Available Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Soil Based on Agricultural Product Safety].Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 Sep 8;40(9):4262-4269. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201901196. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019. PMID: 31854893 Chinese.
-
Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: a review.Environ Int. 2014 Aug;69:177-99. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 27. Environ Int. 2014. PMID: 24875802 Review.
-
Environmental risk thresholds and prediction models of Cd in Chinese agricultural soils.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167773. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167773. Epub 2023 Oct 14. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 37839484
-
[A Comparative Study of Soil Environmental Standards for Agricultural Land Among Different Countries and Its Implication for China].Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Feb 8;43(2):577-585. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202106203. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022. PMID: 35075832 Chinese.
-
Bibliometric Analysis of the Influencing Factors, Derivation, and Application of Heavy Metal Thresholds in Soil.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116561. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35682145 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a Multifaceted Perspective for Systematic Analysis, Assessment, and Performance for Environmental Standards of Contaminated Sites.ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 11;9(3):3078-3091. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05187. eCollection 2024 Jan 23. ACS Omega. 2024. PMID: 38284061 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources