Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 15:324:116334.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116334. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Environmental quality standards for agricultural land in China: What should be improved on derivation methodology?

Affiliations
Review

Environmental quality standards for agricultural land in China: What should be improved on derivation methodology?

Shanshan Li et al. J Environ Manage. .

Abstract

Soil pollution has caused increasingly widespread attention in China. The environmental risk threshold of pollutants is a yardstick to measure soil environmental quality. For decades, plenty of research on soil environmental quality standards (SEQSs) has been carried out, providing scientific basis for the investigation and supervision of soil environmental quality. This paper summaries the development of SEQSs in China, the corresponding influencing factors and methodology of SEQSs derivation. In the current version of SEQSs (GB15618-2018), the thresholds of soil pollutants are derived by the methods of environmental risk assessment, which are more methodologically scientific than geochemical method and ecological effect method used in the previous version (GB15618-1995). Abundant toxicology data on related species is required for risk assessment of soil pollution using extrapolation; however, basic toxicological data is insufficient and few valid data is available at present. Besides, the inadequate consideration on influencing factors for the derivation of soil pollutant threshold would affect the scientificity and rationality of SEQSs, such as biotic factors (species type, test endpoint etc.) and abiotic factors (aging effect, leaching effect, synergistic or antagonistic effects of elements etc.). These problems should be paid close attention in future research on soil environmental quality standards. The contents summarized in this review may provide reference for decision-making on supervision of soil environmental quality and point out important directions for future studies.

Keywords: Derivation methodology; SSD; Soil environmental quality standards; Soil pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources