The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36352914
- PMCID: PMC9638609
- DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21
The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 records screened, we included ten studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding assessment of effectiveness, there was a significant superiority reported in the intervention group when compared to the usual/standard care (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.24 [0.15; 0.32]). The intervention group had a significant reduction in the levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and body mass index compared to the usual/standard care (p < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the levels of high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Self-management group education interventions are recommended in patients with type 2 DM for their effectiveness in different clinical aspects.
Keywords: DM; education; self-management.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32568666 Free PMC article.
-
Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(23):1-40. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074528 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled trial of clinical pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic in Jordan.J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Sep;18(7):516-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.516. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22971205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of telemedicine on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.World J Diabetes. 2021 Feb 15;12(2):170-197. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i2.170. World J Diabetes. 2021. PMID: 33594336 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Mobile App-Assisted Self-Care Interventions for Improving Patient Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and/or Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 4;8(8):e15779. doi: 10.2196/15779. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32459654 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(1 Suppl 1):S86-S127. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S005. Diabetes Care. 2025. PMID: 39651983 Review.
References
-
- Unwin N, Whiting D, Guariguata L. IDF Diabetes Atlas. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2012. International diabetes federation. 2013.
-
- Shi H, Ge Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Teng W, Tian L. Fasting blood glucose and risk of stroke: A dose-response meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:3296–304. - PubMed
-
- Wong TY, Cheung N, Tay WT, Wang JJ, Aung T, Saw SM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: The Singapore malay eye study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1869–75. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources