Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 24:13:1024967.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967. eCollection 2022.

Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study

Ana Saraiva Amaral  1   2   3   4 , Mário Rodrigues Simões  1   2   3 , Sandra Freitas  2   3 , Manuela Vilar  1   2   3 , Liliana Baptista Sousa  2   3   5 , Rosa Marina Afonso  4   6   7
Affiliations

Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study

Ana Saraiva Amaral et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients' autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures related to healthcare decision-making capacity in older adults with cognitive impairment; and study the first version of a new assessment instrument of this capacity.

Method: Nine focus groups were conducted, including healthcare, law and justice, nursing home professionals, institutionalized older adults, and dwelling older adults. Focus group discussions followed semi-structured interview scripts, specifically developed for each group. After group discussions, the assessment instrument was presented, and participants were asked to evaluate each item relevance and comprehensibility. Qualitative coding of the transcriptions was performed with resource to MAXQDA, using direct content analysis.

Results: Six primary themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Decision-making capacity features; Abilities implied in decision-making; Factors influencing decision-making; Obstacles to decision-making; Legal aspects; and Assessment procedures.

Discussion: Results corroborate previous theoretical formulations of capacity. Generally, research results have implications for clinical and assessment practices, as well as preventive strategies that can improve older adult's decision-making capacity. Assessment procedures of capacity should include a thorough protocol for the assessment of cognition, functionality, depressive symptoms, and decision-making abilities. In this respect, the need for an assessment tool that can provide valid information during evaluation processes is highlighted. Concerning the strategies to promote decision-making capacity, these rely on improving older adult's health literacy and healthcare providers communication skills, as well as conduct actions to reduce stigma toward people with dementia.

Keywords: capacity assessment; decision-making; focus groups; healthcare; older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of data analysis process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ABA and APA (2008). Assessment of older adults with diminished capacity: a handbook for psychologists. American Bar Association and American Psychological Association.
    1. Adler R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. J. Hum. Lact. 1–5. doi: 10.1177/08903344221116620 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amaral A. S., Afonso R. M., Simões M. R., Freitas S. (2021). Decision-making capacity in healthcare: instruments review and reflections about its assessment in the elderly with cognitive impairment and dementia. Psychiatry Q. 93, 35–53. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum P. S. (2007). Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1834–1840. doi: 10.1097/01.SA.0000318698.95851.5f - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beleza M. P. (2019). “Brevíssimas notas sobre a criação do regime do maior acompanhado, em substituição dos regimes da interdição e da inabilitação,” in The new legal regime of accompanied adult. eds. Pecorelli A. R., Figueiredo C. F. (Lisboa: Centro de Estudos Judiciários; ), 211–212.

LinkOut - more resources