Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 8;44(11):5543-5549.
doi: 10.3390/cimb44110375.

Usage of DNA Fingerprinting Technology to Check Sample Error and Contamination in Molecular Laboratories

Affiliations

Usage of DNA Fingerprinting Technology to Check Sample Error and Contamination in Molecular Laboratories

Dahui Qin et al. Curr Issues Mol Biol. .

Abstract

Sample identification error is a severe medical error in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories, which can lead to reporting the wrong results for the patient involved. Sample contamination can also lead to incorrect test reports. Avoiding sample identification error and sample contamination could be life-saving. Sample switch and sample contamination could happen on laboratory bench works, especially when pipetting into multi-well plates. It is difficult to realize such errors during laboratory bench work. Laboratory staff may not be aware of such an error when it happens. DNA fingerprinting technology can be used to determine sample identity and subsequently identify sample switch and sample contamination in the laboratory. Our laboratory has explored the usage of this technology in our quality control process and successfully established that DNA fingerprinting can be used to monitor sample switch and sample contamination in next-generation sequencing and BCR/ABL1 real-time PCR bench work.

Keywords: DNA fingerprint; quality control; sample contamination; sample error; sample switch.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This figure consists of the electropherograms from multiple samples of the same category to protect the DNA fingerprint of any one sample. (A) is the DNA fingerprint from the NGS library. The arrow indicates a non-specific peak. (B) is the DNA fingerprint from the original sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This figure consists of the electropherograms from multiple samples of the same category to protect the DNA fingerprint of any one sample. (A) is the DNA fingerprint from the BCR/ABL1 real-time PCR reaction mixture. (B) is the DNA fingerprint from the original sample.
Figure 3
Figure 3
This figure consists of the electropherograms from multiple samples of the same category to protect the DNA fingerprint of any one sample. (A) is the DNA fingerprint from a common reagent. (B) is the DNA fingerprint from the BCR/ABL1 real-time PCR reaction mixture with a high BCR/ABL1 level.
Figure 4
Figure 4
This figure consists of the electropherograms from multiple samples of the same category to protect the DNA fingerprint of any one sample. The DNA from two individuals were mixed with one of them contributing 5% of total DNA as a surrogate of contaminating DNA. Such ‘contaminating’ DNA was detected as indicated by the low peaks (red arrows). Please note that D13S317 is a non-informative marker for this mixture. The two low peaks of D21S11 (green arrows) can be considered as stutters.

References

    1. Logtenberg H., Bakker E. The DNA fingerprint. Endeavour. 1988;12:28–33. doi: 10.1016/0160-9327(88)90207-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thein S.L., Jeffreys A.J., Blacklock H.A. Identification of post-transplant cell population by DNA fingerprint analysis. Lancet. 1986;2:37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92577-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Deerlin V.M., Leonard D.G. Bone marrow engraftment analysis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Clin. Lab. Med. 2000;20:197–225. doi: 10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30083-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hampikian G. Correcting forensic DNA errors. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019;41:32–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parson W. Age Estimation with DNA: From Forensic DNA Fingerprinting to Forensic (Epi) Genomics: A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2018;64:326–332. doi: 10.1159/000486239. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources