Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28;29(11):8146-8159.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110643.

Nomogram for Predicting Distant Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A SEER-Based Population Study

Affiliations

Nomogram for Predicting Distant Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A SEER-Based Population Study

Weibo Li et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for distant metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and develop a valid predictive model to guide clinical practice; (2) Methods: We screened 14328 PDAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Lasso regression analysis combined with logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for PDAC with distant metastasis. A nomogram predicting the risk of distant metastasis in PDAC was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and consistency-index (C-index) were used to determine the accuracy and discriminate ability of the nomogram. A calibration curve was used to assess the agreement between the predicted probability of the model and the actual probability. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical influence curve were employed to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram; (3) Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for distant metastasis of PDAC included age, primary site, histological grade, and lymph node status. A nomogram was successfully constructed, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 for ROC and a C-index of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.860-0.882). The calibration curve showed that the predicted probability of the model was in high agreement with the actual predicted probability. The DCA and clinical influence curve showed that the model had great potential clinical utility; (4) Conclusions: The risk model established in this study has a good predictive performance and a promising potential application, which can provide personalized clinical decisions for future clinical work.

Keywords: distant metastasis; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; prognosis; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of eligible patients’ selection in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) The lasso regression is used to find the optimal lambda value. (B) Results of 10-fold cross-validation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nomogram to predict distant metastasis of PDAC. Others: including pancreatic duct, islets of Langerhans, other specified parts of pancreas, overlapping lesion of pancreas. T: total pancreatectomy; E: extended pancreatectomy; P: partial pancreatectomy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Receiver operating characteristic curve. (B) Calibration curve. (C) Decision curve analysis. (D) Clinical influence curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PDAC patients. (A,B) Effects of distant metastasis on OS and CSS. (C,D) Effects of age on OS and CSS. (E,F) Effects of primary site on OS and CSS. (G,H) Effects of grade on OS and CSS. (I,J) Effects of lymph node status on OS and CSS. OS, Overall survival; CSS, cancer specific survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu W., He X., Yang L., Wang Q., Bian X., Ye J., Li Y., Li L. Rising trends in pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality in 2000–2014. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018;10:789–797. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S160018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L., Smith B.D., Aizenberg R., Rosenzweig A.B., Fleshman J.M., Matrisian L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sohal D.P., Mangu P.B., Khorana A.A., Shah M.A., Philip P.A., O’Reilly E.M., Uronis H.E., Ramanathan R.K., Crane C.H., Engebretson A., et al. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:2784–2796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1412. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types