Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 31;29(11):8261-8268.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110652.

Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Safe for Giant Liver Tumors? Proposal from a Single Institution for Totally Laparoscopic Hemihepatectomy Using an Anterior Approach for Giant Liver Tumors Larger Than 10 cm in Diameter

Affiliations

Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Safe for Giant Liver Tumors? Proposal from a Single Institution for Totally Laparoscopic Hemihepatectomy Using an Anterior Approach for Giant Liver Tumors Larger Than 10 cm in Diameter

Hiroyuki Nitta et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resections for liver tumors that are larger than 10 cm remain unclear. We developed a safe laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for giant liver tumors using an anterior approach.

Methods: Eighty patients who underwent laparoscopic hemihepatectomy between January 2011 and December 2021 were divided into a nongiant tumor group (n = 65) and a giant tumor group (n = 15) for comparison.

Results: The median operating time, amount of blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between the nongiant and giant tumor groups. The sizes of the tumors and weights of the resected liver were significantly larger in the giant tumor group. A comparison between a nongiant group (n = 23) and a giant group (n = 12) treated with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy showed similar results.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy, especially that performed on the right side, for giant tumors larger than 10 cm can be performed safely. Surgical techniques for giant liver tumors have been standardized, and their application is expected to spread widely in the future.

Keywords: anterior approach; giant liver tumor; laparoscopic hepatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trocar placement. The blue circle is the surgical port, and the red circle is the camera port. 5 and 12 are port diameters (mm).
Figure 2
Figure 2
MRI image of giant HCC.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative photo with a space created on the right side of the inferior vena cava.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gagner M., Rheault M., Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg. Endosc. 1992;6:97–98.
    1. Buell J.F., Cherqui D., Geller D.A., O’Rourke N., Iannitti D., Dagher I., Koffron A.J., Thomas M., Gayet B., Han H.S., et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann. Surg. 2009;250:825–830. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Makabe K., Nitta H., Takahara T., Hasegawa Y., Kanno S., Nishizuka S., Sasaki A., Wakabayashi G. Efficacy of occlusion of hepatic artery and risk of carbon dioxide gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatectomy in a pig model. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2014;21:592–598. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi S., Honda G., Kurata M., Tadano S., Sakamoto K., Okuda Y., Abe K. An experimental study on the relationship among airway pressure, pneumoperitoneum pressure, and central venous pressure in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann. Surg. 2016;263:1159–1163. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wakabayashi G., Cherqui D., Geller D.A., Buell J.F., Kaneko H., Han H.S., Asbun H., O’Rourke N., Tanabe M., Koffron A.J., et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann. Surg. 2018;268:11–18. - PubMed