Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 10;10(11):e37624.
doi: 10.2196/37624.

The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review

Alfred Angerer #  1 , Johanna Stahl #  1 , Egzona Krasniqi #  2 , Stefan Banning #  3
Affiliations

The Management Perspective in Digital Health Literature: Systematic Review

Alfred Angerer et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: New digital health technologies are considered one solution to challenges in the health sector, which include rising numbers of chronic diseases and increased health spending. As digitalization in health care is still in its infancy, there are many unanswered questions about the impact of digital health on management.

Objective: This paper assesses the current state of knowledge in the field of digital health from a management perspective. It highlights research gaps within this field to determine future research opportunities.

Methods: A systematic review of digital health literature was conducted using 3 databases. The chosen articles (N=38) were classified according to a taxonomy developed for the purpose, and research gaps were identified based on the topic areas discussed.

Results: The literature review revealed a slight prevalence of practical (n=21, 55%) over theoretical (n=17, 45%) approaches. Most of the papers (n=23, 61%) deal with information technology (IT) and are, therefore, focused more on technology and less on management. The research question in most of the papers (n=31, 82%) deals with the creation of concepts, and very few (n=4, 11%) evaluate or even question existing solutions. Most consider the main reason for digitalization to be the optimization of operational processes (n=26, 68%), and 42% (n=16) deal with new business models. The topic area discussed most frequently was found to be eHealth (n=30, 79%). By contrast, the field of tech health with topics such as sensors receives the least attention (n=3, 8%), despite its significant potential for health care processes and strategy.

Conclusions: Three main research propositions were identified. First, research into digital health innovation should not focus solely on the technology aspects but also on its implications for strategic and operational management. Second, the research community should target other domains besides eHealth. Third, we observed a lack of quantitative research on the real impact of digital health on organizations and their management. More quantitative evidence is required regarding the expected outcome and impact of the implementation of digital health solutions into our health care organizations.

Keywords: data health; digital health; eHealth; health care management; health technology; literature review; management; tech health; trend health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of literature research procedure [15].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of reviewed publications. CAD: computer-aided design; IoT: internet of things; IT: information technology.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Santha A. Deborah Lupton: digital health. critical and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Acta Univ Sapientiae Soc Anal. 2018;8:109–112. doi: 10.2478/aussoc-2018-0007. - DOI
    1. Angerer A, Moll C, Strunk L, Brügger U. Digital Health - Die Zukunft des Schweizer Gesundheitswesens. 2017. [2022-10-20]. https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/bitstream/11475/1458/1/Digital%20Healt... .
    1. Powell J, Newhouse N, Boylan A, Williams V. Digital health citizens and the future of the NHS. Digit Health. 2016 Oct 10;2:2055207616672033. doi: 10.1177/2055207616672033. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207616672033?url_ver=Z39.88... 10.1177_2055207616672033 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lupton D. Digital health now and in the future: Findings from a participatory design stakeholder workshop. Digit Health. 2017 Nov 09;3:2055207617740018. doi: 10.1177/2055207617740018. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207617740018?url_ver=Z39.88... 10.1177_2055207617740018 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosilj Vukšić V, Ivančić L, Suša Vugec D. A preliminary literature review of digital transformation case studies. IJCEIT. 2018;12(9):737–742. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1474581. - DOI

Publication types