Validation of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire among student and nonstudent young adults
- PMID: 36355679
- PMCID: PMC10249775
- DOI: 10.1037/pha0000615
Validation of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire among student and nonstudent young adults
Abstract
The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ) is a widely used measure designed to assess alcohol-related consequences experienced by young adults, but little psychometric work has been done outside of college student populations. The primary goal of this study was to investigate if there were group differences between nonstudents (i.e., those without any postsecondary education) and college students (i.e., currently enrolled in a 4-year institution) on the BYAACQ in terms of (a) the "difficulty" level of a consequence based on endorsement and (b) the association between each consequence and the underlying overall level of consequences. Participants were 724 young adult drinkers (Mage = 20.40, SD = 2.19; 58.8% female) who was either a student currently enrolled in a 4-year college (n = 560; 77.3%) or a nonstudent if they had no current or prior college attendance (n = 164; 22.7%) that completed a survey in-person. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the BYAACQ for both students and nonstudents. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses indicated that six items showed significant DIF in the item difficulty parameters, with college students more likely to experience social- and short-term health-related alcohol consequences, while nonstudents more likely to experience consequences related to impaired control and dependence. Thus, using the latent or sum scores of the entire scale could be problematic, as this overall score is unable to capture specific differences in the types of alcohol consequences experienced between college students and nonstudents. Implications for interventions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Measurement invariance of the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire across college status, race, and childhood SES in a diverse community sample.Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Nov;36(7):824-836. doi: 10.1037/adb0000789. Epub 2021 Oct 14. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022. PMID: 34647776 Free PMC article.
-
Examining drinking game harms as a function of gender and college student status.Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Dec;33(8):685-696. doi: 10.1037/adb0000520. Epub 2019 Oct 17. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 31621341
-
Predictors of Adverse Alcohol Use Consequences Among Tertiary Students.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):877-887. doi: 10.1111/acer.13988. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019. PMID: 30779436
-
An update of research examining college student alcohol-related consequences: new perspectives and implications for interventions.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 May;37(5):709-16. doi: 10.1111/acer.12031. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013. PMID: 23241024 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A scoping review of brief alcohol interventions across young adult subpopulations.Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;36(6):648-663. doi: 10.1037/adb0000800. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022. PMID: 35191717 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Drinking firsts at home and with parental knowledge: Racial/ethnic differences in associations with later alcohol outcomes among underage youth.Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;48(12):2378-2390. doi: 10.1111/acer.15471. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024. PMID: 39455286
References
-
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
-
- Benjamini Y, & Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 57(1), 289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x - DOI