Performance Sex Differences in CrossFit®
- PMID: 36355816
- PMCID: PMC9699255
- DOI: 10.3390/sports10110165
Performance Sex Differences in CrossFit®
Abstract
CrossFit® has a unique standard for workout of the day for women and men. Scaling is used to set difficulty levels for women in CrossFit® gyms and competitions. This type of scaling is applied for weightlifting (60-82% of men's load); however, there are usually no differences in difficulty settings for gymnastics and monostructural metabolic conditioning. Performance analysis is essential for every sports discipline, and statistical data comparing men's and women's results from athletics, running, swimming, weightlifting, etc., are available. However, CrossFit® lacks these statistics. The aim of our study was to analyze how the performances of men and women differed at the 2021 CrossFit Games®. Our sample comprised 40 female (age 27.8 ± 5.1) and 40 male participants (age 27.2 ± 3.7) competing in the Rx division. Data obtained from all events were analyzed using effect size and percentage. In 14 out of 15 events, men achieved better results than women. Even with the implementation of scaling, women's results differed by 0.1-33.1% (effect size from small to large). Scaling for women is designed according to general strength and power differences; however, primarily because of anatomic and physiological differences, men attain better results. However, CrossFit Games® events are always unique, and the events rarely repeat; therefore, our study does not provide firm conclusions. As our study is the first to compare CrossFit Games® performance between the sexes, further research is needed.
Keywords: competition; endurance; gender; strength.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39300545 Free PMC article.
-
Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0283910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283910. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38015875 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Body Composition in CrossFit® Athletes and the Relation with Their Results in Official Training.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):11003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711003. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36078716 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of a CrossFit® Benchmark Performance Profile.Sports (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;9(6):80. doi: 10.3390/sports9060080. Sports (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34199523 Free PMC article.
-
CrossFit®: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit® Performance.Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37368562 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39300545 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in anaerobic performance in CrossFit® athletes: a comparison of three different all-out tests.PeerJ. 2025 Feb 5;13:e18930. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18930. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 39926034 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal Muscle Thickness and Activation during Abdominal Hollowing and Bracing in CrossFit® Athletes.Sports (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;11(8):159. doi: 10.3390/sports11080159. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37624139 Free PMC article.
-
CrossFit® and Its Influence on Health Behaviors, Functional Capacity, and Psychosocial Outcomes: An Explorative Study of Gender Differences in Athlete Perspectives.J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 May 28;10(2):196. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020196. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025. PMID: 40566446 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Knapp B. Rx’d and Shirtless: An Examination of Gender in a CrossFit Box. Women Sport Phys. Act. J. 2015;23:42–53. doi: 10.1123/wspaj.2014-0021. - DOI
-
- Schrijnder S., van Amsterdam N., McLachlan F. ‘These Chicks Go Just as Hard as Us!’ (Un)Doing Gender in a Dutch CrossFit Gym. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport. 2020;56:1–17. doi: 10.1177/1012690220913524. - DOI
-
- Gordon J. Scaling CrossFit Workouts. CrossFit J. 2015:1–7.
-
- Glassman G. What Is Fitness. CrossFit J. 2002:1–10.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials