Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 25;14(11):727.
doi: 10.3390/toxins14110727.

Analytical Validation of a Direct Competitive ELISA for Multiple Mycotoxin Detection in Human Serum

Affiliations

Analytical Validation of a Direct Competitive ELISA for Multiple Mycotoxin Detection in Human Serum

Kunal Garg et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Mycotoxin exposure in humans is primarily assessed through its occurrence in external sources, such as food commodities. Herein, we have developed a direct competitive ELISA to facilitate the detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisin (FUM B1/B2), ochratoxin A (OTA), and zearalenone (ZEA) in human serum. The analytical validation of the assay followed practices endorsed by the international research community and the EU directive 96/23/EC in order to examine detection capability, recovery, and cross-reactivity. The assay demonstrated a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for AFB1 [0.61 ng/mL (hereon ng/mL = ppb)], DON (19.53 ppb), FUM (4.88 ppb), OTA (19.53 ppb), and ZEA (0.15 ppb). Recovery from human serum for all mycotoxins spanned from 73% to 106%. Likewise, the specificity for monoclonal antibodies against cross-reactant mycotoxins ranged from 2% to 11%. This study compares the LLOQ and recovery values with commercial and emerging immuno-based methods for detecting mycotoxins in foodstuffs. The LLOQ values from the present study were among the lowest in commercial or emerging methods. Despite the differences in the extraction protocols and matrices, the recovery range in this study, commercial tests, and other procedures were similar for all mycotoxins. Overall, the assay detected AFB1, DON, FUM, OTA, and ZEA in human serum with excellent accuracy, precision, and specificity.

Keywords: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; human biological monitoring; multiple mycotoxins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yes, the authors have competing interests as defined by MDPI Toxins or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results or discussion reported herein. Following MDPI Toxins policy, the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests, K.G. and L.G. have a financial and business interest in Tezted Ltd. Further, F.V.-A. and F.S.-R. are employed by the Sanoviv Medical Institute and they do not have commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Sanoviv Medical Institute and Tezted Ltd had no role in experimental design, reporting of the results, or the decision to publish.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calibration curves with a 4PL and Gaussian fit for AFB1, DON, FUM, OTA, and ZEA. (a) The assay can accurately measure low amounts of analyte as the four-parameter logistic (4PL) curve establishes a near-perfect fit (R²) for all mycotoxins. The coefficient of determination (R²) is the ratio of the variation that the 4PL curve-fitting model explains to the total variation in the model. The R² value will equal 1 for a perfect fit and will be closer to 0 for a bad 4PL fit. Furthermore, the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) is the lowest amount of an analyte detectable in a sample with suitable accuracy. As a result, Figure 1a presents the LLOQ in ppb for each mycotoxin and the associated accuracy percentages at the LLOQs achieved through back-calculation. (b) Gaussian curve fit analysis and associated coefficient values used to predict the concentration (in ng/mL or ppb) for recovery and the matrix interference analysis are in Table 1. The a, b, and c Gaussian coefficients refer to the height of the curve’s peak, the position of the center of the peak, and the standard deviation, respectively. In panels a and b, %B/B0 refers to the OD value with (B) and without (B0) competition for antibody binding sites on the microplate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Monoclonal antibodies against specific mycotoxins do not significantly cross-react.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sulyok M., Krska R., Schuhmacher R. A Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometric Multi-Mycotoxin Method for the Quantification of 87 Analytes and Its Application to Semi-Quantitative Screening of Moldy Food Samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007;389:1505–1523. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1542-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Binder E.M. Managing the Risk of Mycotoxins in Modern Feed Production. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 2007;133:149–166. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.008. - DOI
    1. European Commission Decision of 12 August 2002, Implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC Concerning the Performance of Analytical Methods and the Interpretation of Results (2002/657/EC) [(accessed on 27 October 2021)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:221:000....
    1. European Commission Recommendation 401/2006 of 23 February 2006, Laying Down the Methods of Sampling and Analysis for the Official Control of the Levels of Mycotoxins in Foodstuffs. [(accessed on 28 August 2022)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2006R0401....
    1. Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. [(accessed on 27 October 2021)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Bioanalytical-Method-Validatio....

LinkOut - more resources