Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 14;15(21):2192-2202.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.036.

Trans-Stent FFR Gradient as a Modifiable Integrant in Predicting Long-Term Target Vessel Failure

Affiliations
Free article

Trans-Stent FFR Gradient as a Modifiable Integrant in Predicting Long-Term Target Vessel Failure

Barry F Uretsky et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with long-term outcomes. Data relating FFR-based trans-stent gradient (TSG) after PCI to long-term outcomes are sparse.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test whether TSG is associated with adverse events at follow-up after PCI.

Methods: Data were gathered from a prospective registry evaluating 501 vessels in 416 patients with median follow-up period of 596 days. Primary endpoints were: 1) target vessel failure (TVF), including target vessel revascularization, and target vessel myocardial infarction after discharge; and 2) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including TVF, target vessel revascularization, nontarget vessel MI, cardiac death.

Results: After PCI, median post-PCI FFR was 0.86 and median TSG was 0.04. TSG >0.04 was associated with increased rates of TVF (8.7% vs 2.9%; P = 0.014) and MACE (17.8% vs 9.2%; P = 0.02). Post-PCI FFR < 0.86 was associated with increased rates of TVF (6.1% vs 2.2%; P = 0.03) and MACE (16.5% vs 10%; P = 0.036). The vessel subgroup with high TSG and low FFR had significantly higher rates of TVF (10.2%; P = 0.02) and MACE (20.1%; P = 0.049) than vessels with: 1) high TSG and high FFR (TVF, 2.9%; MACE, 9.7%); 2) low TSG and low FFR (TVF, 3.8%; MACE, 11.3%); and 3) low TSG high FFR (TVF, 2.2%; MACE, 7.5%). In multivariate analysis, TSG was independently predictive of TVF.

Conclusions: Higher TSG was an independent predictor of adverse events, particularly TVF, and identified a subgroup of patients at higher risk for poor outcomes. The combination of high TSG and low FFR showed significantly worse outcomes compared with an "ideal result" (high FFR and low TSG). These data support a recommendation to use TSG during FFR evaluation to determine the functional success of PCI.

Keywords: fractional flow reserve; major adverse cardiac outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis; target vessel revascularization; trans-stent gradient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Biscaglia has received research grant from Medis, Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd, Siemens, Insight Lifetech, and GE; and has received personal fees from Siemens and Insight Lifetech. Dr Uretsky has received research grants from Opsens and Philips. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources