Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;38(6):1793-1800.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05789-7. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

Shared genetic risk across different presentations of gene test-negative idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Affiliations

Shared genetic risk across different presentations of gene test-negative idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Mallory L Downie et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Idiop athic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is classified in children according to response to initial corticosteroid therapy into steroid-sensitive (SSNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), and in adults according to histology into minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). However, there is well-recognised phenotypic overlap between these entities. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have shown a strong association between SSNS and variation at HLA, suggesting an underlying immunological basis. We sought to determine whether a risk score generated from genetic variants associated with SSNS could be used to gain insight into the pathophysiology of INS presenting in other ways.

Methods: We developed an SSNS genetic risk score (SSNS-GRS) from the five variants independently associated with childhood SSNS in a previous European GWAS. We quantified SSNS-GRS in independent cohorts of European individuals with childhood SSNS, non-monogenic SRNS, MCD, and FSGS, and contrasted them with SSNS-GRS quantified in individuals with monogenic SRNS, membranous nephropathy (a different immune-mediated disease-causing nephrotic syndrome), and healthy controls.

Results: The SSNS-GRS was significantly elevated in cohorts with SSNS, non-monogenic SRNS, MCD, and FSGS compared to healthy participants and those with membranous nephropathy. The SSNS-GRS in all cohorts with non-monogenic INS were also significantly elevated compared to those with monogenic SRNS.

Conclusions: The shared genetic risk factors among patients with different presentations of INS strongly suggests a shared autoimmune pathogenesis when monogenic causes are excluded. Use of the SSNS-GRS, in addition to testing for monogenic causes, may help to classify patients presenting with INS. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Keywords: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; Genetic risk score; Minimal change disease; Monogenic; Paediatrics; Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Genetic Risk Scores in SSNS, SRNS, MCD, and FSGS are elevated compared with control cohorts and monogenic INS. A Distribution of genetic risk scores in non-monogenic and monogenic INS compared to healthy controls. The x-axis represents SSNS-GRS. Median values for each group are represented by vertical lines with distribution of SSNS-GRS displayed through density plots for each cohort. Asterisks indicate p <0.007 using the Kruskal–Wallis test with correction for planned comparisons to healthy controls. B Density of SSNS-GRS in individuals with monogenic versus autoimmune INS. C ROC curve for monogenic versus autoimmune INS. SSNS, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome; MCD, minimal change disease; SRNS, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; INS, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome; GRS, genetic risk score; ROC, receiver operating characteristic

References

    1. Eddy AA, Symons JM (2003) Nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Lancet 362:629–639. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14184-0 - PubMed
    1. Cattran DC, Feehally J, Cook HT, Liu ZH, Fervenza FC, Mezzano SA, Floege J, Nachman PH, Gipson DS, Praga M, Glassock RJ, Radhakrishnan J, Hodson EM, Rovin BH, Jha V, Troyanov S, Li PKT, Wetzels JFM. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) glomerulonephritis work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(2):139–274. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.9. - DOI
    1. (1978) Nephrotic syndrome in children: prediction of histopathology from clinical and laboratory characteristics at time of diagnosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. Kidney Int 13(2):159–165. 10.1038/ki.1978.23 - PubMed
    1. (1981) Primary nephrotic syndrome in children: clinical significance of histopathologic variants of minimal change and of diffuse mesangial hypercellularity. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. Kidney Int 20(6):765–771. 10.1038/ki.1981.209 - PubMed
    1. D’Agati VD, Kaskel FJ, Falk RJ. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2398–2411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1106556. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts