Traveling Across States for Prohibited Treatments: Medical Aid in Dying and Looming Battles Over Abortion
- PMID: 36357727
- PMCID: PMC9905322
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07898-3
Traveling Across States for Prohibited Treatments: Medical Aid in Dying and Looming Battles Over Abortion
Abstract
This JGIM Perspective discusses new and emerging challenges with accessing controversial medical therapies like medical aid in dying and abortion. While some states permit these therapies for only their residents, other states prohibit these therapies for their own residents. We summarize recent developments and growing challenges for clinicians treating "medical tourism" patients from other jurisdictions.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
References
-
- Gideonse v. Brown, Case No. 3:21-CV-568 (D. Ore), Complaint (October 28, 2021) and Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims (March 28, 2022).
-
- Cohen IG. Patients with Passports: Medical Tourism, Law, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
-
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. __, No. 19-1392 (June 24, 2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (last accessed Nov. 7, 2022).
-
- Bluestein v. Scott, No. 2:22-CV-160 (D. Vt. Aug. 25, 2022) (Complaint).
-
- New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical