Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 24;14(21):5208.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14215208.

Predictors of Survival in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Affiliations

Predictors of Survival in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Bogdan Badic et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Oncological strategies in the elderly population are debated. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive factors of survival in patients aged 80 years and older with metastatic colon cancer. Data from four digestive tumour registry databases were used in this analysis. This population-based retrospective study included 1115 patients aged 80 years and older with stage IV colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Cox regression was used to assess the impact of different prognostic factors. Age was significantly correlated with the surgical treatment (p < 0.001) but not with overall survival. Patients with a low comorbidity burden had better survival than patients with higher comorbidities scores (9.4 (0−123) versus 7.9 (0−115) months) (p = 0.03). Surgery was more common for proximal colon cancer (p < 0.001), but the location of the primary lesion was not correlated with improved survival (p = 0.07). Patients with lung metastases had a better prognosis than those with liver metastases (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.40, 0.77 p < 0.001); multiple organ involvement had the worst survival (HR 1.32 95% CI 1.15, 1.51 p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was associated with improved survival for both operated (HR 0.45 95% CI 0.35, 0.58 p < 0.001) and non-operated patients (HR 0.41 95% CI 0.34, 0.50 p < 0.001). The majority of patients receiving adjuvant treatment had a low comorbidity burden. In our study, the location of metastases but not the primary tumor location had an impact on overall survival. Low comorbidity burden, curative surgery, and chemotherapy had a significant advantage for elderly patients with metastatic colon cancer.

Keywords: chemotherapy; elderly; stage-4 colon cancer; surgery; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Survival rates stratified by age groups (80–85 years (median 5.90, 95% CI 4.71 to 6.67), 86–90 years (median 3.71, 95% CI 3.00 to 4.45), >90 years (median 2.22, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.12), Log-rank p < 0.0001). (B) Survival rates stratified by metastases location (Peritoneal carcinomatosis (median 4.66, 95% CI 3.29 to 5.90), Liver metastases (median 4.54, 95% CI 3.83 to 5.36), Multiple site metastases (median 3.43, 95% CI 2.77 to 4.22), Lung metastases (median 16.29, 95% CI 3.90 to 21.35), Other single site metastases (median 8.96, 95% CI 2.35 to 12.93), Log-rank p < 0.0001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Survival rates stratified by type of surgery (no surgery (median 2.45, 95% CI 2.16 to 2.80); palliative surgery (derivative stoma, internal bypass) (median 3.13, 95% CI 2.13 to 4.43); complete resection (complete resection of primary tumor and metastases) (median 36.40, 95% CI 18.16 to 123.06); Incomplete resection (incomplete resection of primary tumor and metastases) (median 7.32, 95% CI 6.38 to 8.80) Log-rank p < 0.0001). (B) Survival rates stratified by chemotherapy (complete resection of primary lesion and adjuvant chemotherapy (median 36.10, 95% CI 18.16 to 56.20); palliative chemotherapy (median 7.96, 95% CI 6.76 to 10.00); best supportive care (median 2.06, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.32) Log-rank p < 0.0001).

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Commission B Population Structure and Ageing. [(accessed on 13 August 2022)]; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Popul....
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Sauer A.G., Fedewa S.A., Butterly L.F., Anderson J.C., Cercek A., Smith R.A., Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:145–164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Defossez G., Uhry Z., Delafosse P., Dantony E., D’Almeida T., Plouvier S., Bossard N., Bouvier A.M., Molinié F., Woronoff A.S., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality trends in France over 1990–2018 for solid tumors: The sex gap is narrowing. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:726. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08261-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources