Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 27;14(21):5283.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14215283.

Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Using Calcium Electroporation

Charlotte Egeland  1   2 , Lene Baeksgaard  3 , Julie Gehl  2   4 , Ismail Gögenur  2   5 , Michael Patrick Achiam  1   2
Affiliations

Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Using Calcium Electroporation

Charlotte Egeland et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Calcium electroporation (CaEP) is a novel cancer therapy wherein high intracellular calcium levels, facilitated by reversible electroporation, trigger tumor necrosis. This study aimed to establish safety with CaEP within esophageal cancer. Patients with non-curable esophageal cancer were included at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet in 2021 and 2022. In an outpatient setting, calcium gluconate was injected intratumorally followed by reversible electroporation applied with an endoscopic electrode. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of adverse events, followed by palliation of dysphagia. All patients were evaluated with CT and upper endoscopies up to two months after treatment. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04958044). Eight patients were treated. One serious adverse event (anemia, requiring a single blood transfusion) and three adverse events (mild retrosternal pain (two) and oral thrush (one)) were registered. Initially, six patients suffered from dysphagia: two reported dysphagia relief and four reported no change. From the imaging evaluation, one patient had a partial response, three patients had no response, and four patients had progression. Six months after treatment, the patient who responded well was still in good condition and without the need for further oncological treatment. CaEP was conducted in eight patients with only a few side effects. This study opens the way for larger studies evaluating tumor regression and symptom palliation.

Keywords: calcium electroporation; esophageal cancer; malignant dysphagia; palliation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Charlotte Egeland gave a presentation at an expert meeting hosted by Mirai Medical and Werfen in Barcelona on 21 April 2022. All expenses were covered by Mirai Medical. Experiences with the electrode and its usability was shared; results from the trial were not shared. Mirai Medical had no representatives in the investigator group, and they did not influence trial design, the performance of the trial, data processing, or manuscript preparation/reviewing. Besides this, the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) The electroporator (ePORE®) is connected with a heart synchronization system. (b) Calcium gluconate. (c) The electrode (EndoVE®) is attached to the tip of the endoscope. (d) Calcium gluconate is injected into the tumor and the pulses are delivered. The procedure is repeated until the whole tumor area is covered.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Imaging response. CT imaging at (a) baseline, (b) three weeks, and (c) two months after treatment. The arrows indicate the tumor localization in the thoracic part of the esophagus. (a) Largest esophageal wall thickness is 10 mm. A left main bronchial impression is seen due to tumor size. (b) Diminishing circumferential wall thickness corresponding to the treated area. The bronchial impression is no longer observed. (c) No further changes, stable disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endoscopic findings, patient ID 1-10 (only patients who received treatment). Endoscopic images from the tumor site before treatment and again at follow-up. It is clear to see that already within the first week, in most of the patients, the treated area is covered by a fibrin layer. In no patients was a total visual response seen.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society Survival Rates for Esophageal Cancer 2022. [(accessed on 9 June 2022)]. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/esophagus-cancer/detection-diagnosis-stagi....
    1. Obermannová R., Alsina M., Cervantes A., Leong T., Lordick F., Nilsson M., van Grieken N.C.T., Vogel A., Smyth E.C. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2022;33:992–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjaer D.W., Nassar M., Jensen L.S., Svendsen L.B., Mortensen F.V. A bridging stent to surgery in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer has a dramatic negative impact on patient survival: A retrospective cohort study through data acquired from a prospectively maintained national database. Dis. Esophagus. 2017;30:1–7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12474. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Egeland C., Bazancir L.A., Bui N.H., Baeksgaard L., Gehl J., Gögenur I., Achiam M. Palliation of dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer—A retrospective Danish study from a highly specialized center. Support Care Cancer. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07316-8. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources