Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 30;12(21):2981.
doi: 10.3390/ani12212981.

Changes in Management, Welfare, Emotional State, and Human-Related Docility in Stallions

Affiliations

Changes in Management, Welfare, Emotional State, and Human-Related Docility in Stallions

Silvana Popescu et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite an increase in awareness of their essential needs, many stallions continue to be kept in conditions limiting their social interactions and movement. To supplement the studies which highlight the effects of these practices on selected aspects of equine mental and physical wellbeing, we aimed to monitor a group of 32 adult intact stallions during their transition from tethered housing with limited outdoor access to free group housing through the lens of their overall welfare, perceived emotional status, and docility toward humans. Over three visits (before the management change, two weeks, and three months after, respectively), their welfare, qualitative behavior, and docility were assessed. Analysis of the data collected showed an improvement in the stallions' overall welfare and no decrease in their docility after their group-release, with a constant correlation between these two aspects. The evaluation of their emotional states was less relevant, lacking consistency between the assessments for most of the descriptors used, warranting further research in similar conditions. Although our study covered a relatively short period of time, our results provide encouraging support for stallion owners in deciding on a similar management change for the welfare of their animals.

Keywords: group housing; horse welfare; human-related docility; qualitative behavioral assessment; stallions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of the IQWS in the 32 stallions within the three welfare assessments performed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages of stallions in the established qualitative welfare classes (acceptable, enhanced, and excellent) in the three welfare assessments performed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broom D.M. Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J. 1986;142:524–526. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hewson C.J. What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. Can. Vet. J. 2003;44:496–499. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burger D., Wedekind C., Wespi B., Imboden I., Meinecke-Tillmann S., Sieme H. The potential effects of social interactions on reproductive efficiency of stallions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012;32:455–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.05.076. - DOI
    1. Christensen J.W., Zharkikh T., Ladewig J., Yasinetskaya N. Social behaviour in stallion groups (Equus przewalskii and Equus caballus) kept under natural and domestic conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00208-8. - DOI
    1. Gehlen H., Krumbach K., Thöne-Reineke C. Keeping stallions in groups—Species-appropriate or relevant to animal welfare? Animals. 2021;11:1317. doi: 10.3390/ani11051317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources