Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28;12(11):2621.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112621.

A Novel Ultrasonographic Anthropometric-Independent Measurement of Median Nerve Swelling in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The "Nerve/Tendon Ratio" (NTR)

Affiliations

A Novel Ultrasonographic Anthropometric-Independent Measurement of Median Nerve Swelling in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The "Nerve/Tendon Ratio" (NTR)

Paolo Falsetti et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: There is little consensus on ultrasound (US) normative values of cross-sectional area of median nerve (MN-CSA) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) because of its dependency on anthropometric parameters. We aim to propose a novel anthropometric-independent US parameter: MN-CSA/flexor radialis carpi CSA (FCR-CSA) ratio (“Nerve Tendon Ratio”, NTR), in the diagnosis of clinically and electrodiagnostic (EDS)-defined CTS. Methods: 74 wrists of 49 patients with clinically defined CTS underwent EDS (scored by the 1−5 Padua Scale of electrophysiological severity, PS) and US of carpal tunnel with measurement of MN-CSA (at the carpal tunnel inlet), FCR-CSA (over scaphoid tubercle) and its ratio (NTR, expressed as a percentage). US normality values and intra-operator agreement were assessed in 33 healthy volunteers. Results: In controls, the mean MN-CSA was 5.81 mm2, NTR 64.2%. In 74 clinical CTS, the mean MN-CSA was 12.1 mm2, NTR 117%. In severe CTS (PS > 3), the mean MN-CSA was 15.9 mm2, NTR 148%. In CTS, both MN-CSA and NTR correlated with sensitive conduction velocity (SCV) (p < 0.001), distal motor latency (DML) (p < 0.001) and PS (p < 0.001), with a slight superiority of NTR vs. MN-CSA when controlled for height, wrist circumference and weight. In CTS filtered for anthropometric extremes, only NTR maintained a correlation with SCV (p = 0.023), DML (p = 0.016) and PS (p = 0.009). Diagnostic cut-offs were obtained with a binomial regression analysis. In those patients with a clinical diagnosis of CTS, the cut-off of MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.983) was 8 mm2 (9 mm2 with highest positive predictive value, PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.987), the cut-off was 83% (100% with highest PPV). In patients with EDS findings of severe CTS (PS > 3), the MN-CSA (AUROC: 0.876) cut-off was 12.3 mm2 (15.3 mm2 with highest PPV), while for NTR (AUROC: 0.858) it was 116.2% (146.0% with highest PPV). Conclusions: NTR can be simply and quickly calculated, and it can be used in anthropometric extremes.

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome; electrodiagnostics; median nerve; neuropathy; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transverse scan over left carpal tunnel of a tall male, asymptomatic for CTS in left hand (180 cm × 85 kg, 19 cm of wrist circumference). Linear 6–18 MHz probe. The MN-CSA (area 1) results of 11 mm2 are suggestive of pathologic swelling, but EDS was normal (PS = 0, performed as control side, for CTS in the right side). The flexor carpi radialis (FCR) shows a CSA (area 2) of 14 mm2. MN = median nerve, FPL = flexor pollicis longus, * = transverse ligament, FDS = flexor digitorum superficialis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transverse scan over left and right carpal tunnels in male patient (172 cm × 82 kg, 18.5 cm of wrist circumference) affected with extremely severe CTS (Padua Scale 5 bilaterally). Linear 4–15 MHz probe. Both MN-CSA show frankly pathologic values (Area 1, left: 17 mm2, Area 3, right: 14 mm2). NTR is calculated as the ratio between MN-CSA and FCR-CSA (expressed as a percentage), and shows bilaterally pathologic values (left 143%, right 119%) indicative for severe CTS. MN = median nerve, FCR = flexor carpi radialis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves obtained comparing each US parameter (MN-CSA and NTR) in the clinical diagnosis of CTS (as gold standard).
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves obtained comparing each US parameter (MN-CSA and NTR) in severe EDS-defined (PS > 3) diagnosis of CTS (as gold standard).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Transverse scan over right carpal tunnel in a small female patient (150 cm × 50 kg, 13.7 cm of wrist circumference) affected with medium-grade CTS (Padua Scale 3, SCV 37.1 m/sec, DML 4.8 ms). Linear 8–24 MHz probe. Both areas of median nerve (MN) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) were manually traced. A MN-CSA of 12 mm2 is not always considered pathologic (cut-off for MN neuropathy until 14–15 mm2 in some studies on CTS) and the severity is often underestimated because of the anthropometric characteristics of the patient. The NTR shows values unequivocally pathologic (124%), as MN-CSA is compared with an anatomic structure (FCR-CSA) that maintains small dimensions in CTS, following the anthropometric characteristics of the patient.

References

    1. Pelosi L., Arányi Z., Beekman R., Bland J., Coraci D., Hobson-Webb L.D., Padua L., Podnar S., Simon N., van Alfen N., et al. Expert consensus on the combined investigation of carpal tunnel syndrome with electrodiagnostic tests and neuromuscular ultrasound. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2022;135:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoshii Y., Zhao C., Amadio P.C. Recent Advances in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Diagnostics. 2020;10:596. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steimle J., Gabriel S., Tarr R., Kohrs B., Johnston P., Martineau D. Comparing Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Available on the Internet With AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hand. 2020;15:514–520. doi: 10.1177/1558944718821417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erickson M., Lawrence M., Lucado A. The role of diagnostic ultrasound in the examination of carpal tunnel syndrome: An update and systematic review. J. Hand Ther. 2022;35:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beekman R., Visser L.H. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27:26–33. doi: 10.1002/mus.10227. - DOI - PubMed