A Randomized, Controlled Animal Study: 21% or 100% Oxygen during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Asphyxiated Infant Piglets
- PMID: 36360329
- PMCID: PMC9688656
- DOI: 10.3390/children9111601
A Randomized, Controlled Animal Study: 21% or 100% Oxygen during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Asphyxiated Infant Piglets
Abstract
Background: During pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), resuscitation guidelines recommend 100% oxygen (O2); however, the most effective O2 concentration for infants unknown. Aim: We aimed to determine if 21% O2 during CPR with either chest compression (CC) during sustained inflation (SI) (CC + SI) or continuous chest compression with asynchronized ventilation (CCaV) will reduce time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared to 100% O2 in infant piglets with asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest. Methods: Piglets (20−23 days of age, weighing 6.2−10.2 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented, and exposed to asphyxia. Cardiac arrest was defined as mean arterial blood pressure < 25 mmHg with bradycardia. After cardiac arrest, piglets were randomized to CC + SI or CCaV with either 21% or 100% O2 or the sham. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, carotid blood flow, and respiratory parameters were continuously recorded. Main results: Baseline parameters, duration, and degree of asphyxiation were not different. Median (interquartile range) time to ROSC was 107 (90−440) and 140 (105−200) s with CC + SI 21% and 100% O2, and 600 (50−600) and 600 (95−600) s with CCaV 21% and 100% O2 (p = 0.27). Overall, six (86%) and six (86%) piglets with CC + SI 21% and 100% O2, and three (43%) and three (43%) piglets achieved ROSC with CCaV 21% and 100% O2 (p = 0.13). Conclusions: In infant piglets resuscitated with CC + SI, time to ROSC reduced and survival improved compared to CCaV. The use of 21% O2 had similar time to ROSC, short-term survival, and hemodynamic recovery compared to 100% oxygen. Clinical studies comparing 21% with 100% O2 during infant CPR are warranted.
Keywords: asphyxia; chest compressions; infants; oxygen; resuscitation; sustained inflation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Continuous chest compression during sustained inflation versus continuous compression with asynchronized ventilation in an infantile porcine model of severe bradycardia.Resusc Plus. 2024 Apr 9;18:100629. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100629. eCollection 2024 Jun. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 38617441 Free PMC article.
-
Sustained Inflation During Chest Compression: A New Technique of Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation That Improves Recovery and Survival in a Pediatric Porcine Model.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019136. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019136. Epub 2021 Jul 21. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34284596 Free PMC article.
-
Chest compressions superimposed with sustained inflations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in asphyxiated pediatric piglets.Pediatr Res. 2024 Mar;95(4):988-995. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02563-9. Epub 2023 Mar 17. Pediatr Res. 2024. PMID: 36932182 Clinical Trial.
-
Chest Compressions During Sustained Inflation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Newborn Infants Translating Evidence From Animal Studies to the Bedside.JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019 Feb 25;4(1):116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.12.004. eCollection 2019 Feb. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019. PMID: 30847426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation or 3:1 Compression/Ventilation Ratio During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery Room: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;12(2):230. doi: 10.3390/children12020230. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40003332 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Intramuscular versus intravenous epinephrine administration in a pediatric porcine model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 13;20:100769. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100769. eCollection 2024 Dec. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 39309745 Free PMC article.
-
Threshold to initiate chest compressions for bradycardia at birth: A narrative review.J Perinatol. 2025 Jul;45(7):900-906. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02320-2. Epub 2025 May 13. J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 40360699 Review.
-
The Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2023 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037295. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037295. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 39968794 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Assessing the human factors involved in chest compression with superimposed sustained inflation during neonatal and paediatric resuscitation: A randomized crossover study.Resusc Plus. 2024 Jul 17;19:100721. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100721. eCollection 2024 Sep. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 39108281 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous chest compression during sustained inflation versus continuous compression with asynchronized ventilation in an infantile porcine model of severe bradycardia.Resusc Plus. 2024 Apr 9;18:100629. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100629. eCollection 2024 Jun. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 38617441 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wyckoff M.H., Singletary E.M., Soar J., Olasveengen T.M., Greif R., Liley H.G., Zideman D., Bhanji F., Andersen L.W., Avis S.R., et al. 2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations: Summary from the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group. Circulation. 2021;145:e645–e721. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001017. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aziz K., Lee C.H.C., Escobedo M.B., Hoover A.V., Kamath-Rayne B.D., Kapadia V.S., Magid D.J., Niermeyer S., Schmölzer G.M., Szyld E., et al. Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Pediatrics. 2021;147((Suppl. S1)):e2020038505E. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-038505E. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Topjian A.A., Raymond T.T., Atkins D., Chan M., Duff J.P., Joyner B.L., Jr., Lasa J.J., Lavonas E.J., Levy A., Mahgoub M., et al. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142((Suppl. S2)):S469–S523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wyckoff M.H., Wyllie J.P., Aziz K., de Almeida M.F., Fabres J.W., Fawke J., Guinsburg R., Hosono S., Isayama T., Kapadia V.S., et al. Neonatal Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2020;142((Suppl. S1)):329–337. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000895. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aziz K., Lee H.C., Escobedo M.B., Hoover A.V., Kamath-Rayne B.D., Kapadia V.S., Magid D.J., Niermeyer S., Schmölzer G.M., Szyld E.G., et al. Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142((Suppl. S2)):S524–S550. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources