Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 27;10(11):2137.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112137.

What Are the Contemporary Trends on Euphonic Voice Research? A Scientometric Analysis

Clara Puig-Herreros  1 , José Luis Sanz  2 , Vicent Rosell-Clari  1 , Luz Barona  3 , María Melo  2
Affiliations

What Are the Contemporary Trends on Euphonic Voice Research? A Scientometric Analysis

Clara Puig-Herreros et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

(1) Background: The study of the human euphonic voice is a subject that has been researched in recent years from different perspectives. Therefore, it is pertinent to assess the current state of the science. The aim of analyzing the characteristics of normal voice-related publications over the last 11 years is to identify research trends, the numerical and temporal evolution of the publications, their type, and the most-used descriptors. (2) Methods: Bibliometric data from 2011 to 2021 were obtained through several databases. Subsequently, a science mapping analysis was made via VOSviewer software. (3) Results: A total of 901 publications were obtained. The analysis of the scientific production on the field of study regarding the euphonic voice shows a slight increase over the last 11 years, with an average of 82 publications per year. Co-authorship analysis revealed a 6215 authors contributing to the field with a 901 articles (headed by Jiang, J.J. with 18 articles). Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted the lack of temporal advancement and variety in the terminology used in the field of voice research. (4) Conclusions: This scientometric study sheds light to the need to broaden in this field of study and the establishment of solid research groups to contribute to its advancement.

Keywords: bibliometry; euphonic voice; normal voice; scientometry; speech; voice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual distribution of published articles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications per journal (from lowest to highest number).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Authors’ network visualization (VOSviewer). Based on data from the most productive authors, established by the aforementioned limits (publications with a maximum of 10 authors and authors with a minimum production of 5 papers).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Top 10 institutions with the largest number of publications.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Countries with the highest number of publications.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Most-used keywords (the redder color indicates a more frequent use, and the green color less frequent use). Based on data from the most common keywords, established by the aforementioned limits (the number of occurrences of each term was set at 5).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Keyword co-occurrence showing changes over the studied period. Blue colors identify the most-used terms in the initial part of the period.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Barboza-Palomino M., Salas G., Vega-Arce M., Caycho-Rodríguez T., Ventura-León J., Kanter P.E.F., Salas-Blas E., Landa-Barzola M., López-López W. Thirty Years of Psicothema: A Bibliometric Analysis (1989–2018) Psicothema. 2020;32:459–468. - PubMed
    1. Van Leeuwen T. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2004. Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics; pp. 373–388.
    1. Moed H.F. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evalu-ation. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2009;57:13. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerrero-Gironés J., Forner L., Sanz J.L., Rodríguez-Lozano F.J., Ghilotti J., Llena C., Lozano A., Melo M. Scientific production on silicate-based endodontic materials: Evolution and current state: A bibliometric analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2002;26:5611–5624. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04605-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Probst J., Lodermeyer A., Fattoum S., Becker S., Echternach M., Richter B., Döllinger M., Kniesburges S. Acoustic and Aerodynamic Coupling during Phonation in MRI-Based Vocal Tract Replicas. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:3562. doi: 10.3390/app9173562. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources