What Are the Contemporary Trends on Euphonic Voice Research? A Scientometric Analysis
- PMID: 36360478
- PMCID: PMC9690488
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10112137
What Are the Contemporary Trends on Euphonic Voice Research? A Scientometric Analysis
Abstract
(1) Background: The study of the human euphonic voice is a subject that has been researched in recent years from different perspectives. Therefore, it is pertinent to assess the current state of the science. The aim of analyzing the characteristics of normal voice-related publications over the last 11 years is to identify research trends, the numerical and temporal evolution of the publications, their type, and the most-used descriptors. (2) Methods: Bibliometric data from 2011 to 2021 were obtained through several databases. Subsequently, a science mapping analysis was made via VOSviewer software. (3) Results: A total of 901 publications were obtained. The analysis of the scientific production on the field of study regarding the euphonic voice shows a slight increase over the last 11 years, with an average of 82 publications per year. Co-authorship analysis revealed a 6215 authors contributing to the field with a 901 articles (headed by Jiang, J.J. with 18 articles). Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted the lack of temporal advancement and variety in the terminology used in the field of voice research. (4) Conclusions: This scientometric study sheds light to the need to broaden in this field of study and the establishment of solid research groups to contribute to its advancement.
Keywords: bibliometry; euphonic voice; normal voice; scientometry; speech; voice.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Barboza-Palomino M., Salas G., Vega-Arce M., Caycho-Rodríguez T., Ventura-León J., Kanter P.E.F., Salas-Blas E., Landa-Barzola M., López-López W. Thirty Years of Psicothema: A Bibliometric Analysis (1989–2018) Psicothema. 2020;32:459–468. - PubMed
-
- Van Leeuwen T. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2004. Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics; pp. 373–388.
-
- Guerrero-Gironés J., Forner L., Sanz J.L., Rodríguez-Lozano F.J., Ghilotti J., Llena C., Lozano A., Melo M. Scientific production on silicate-based endodontic materials: Evolution and current state: A bibliometric analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2002;26:5611–5624. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04605-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Probst J., Lodermeyer A., Fattoum S., Becker S., Echternach M., Richter B., Döllinger M., Kniesburges S. Acoustic and Aerodynamic Coupling during Phonation in MRI-Based Vocal Tract Replicas. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:3562. doi: 10.3390/app9173562. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
