Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14071.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114071.

Child Welfare Reform: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Child Welfare Reform: A Scoping Review

Jill R McTavish et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

While there have been ongoing calls to reform child welfare so that it better meets children's and families' needs, to date there have been no comprehensive summaries of child welfare reform strategies. For this systematic scoping review, we summarized authors' recommendations for improving child welfare. We conducted a systematic search (2010 to 2021) and included published reviews that addressed authors' recommendations for improving child welfare for children, youth, and families coming into contact with child welfare in high-income countries. A total of 4758 records was identified by the systematic search, 685 full-text articles were screened for eligibility, and 433 reviews were found to be eligible for this scoping review. Reviews were theoretically divided, with some review authors recommending reform efforts at the macro level (e.g., addressing poverty) and others recommending reform efforts at the practice level (e.g., implementing evidence-based parenting programs). Reform efforts across socioecological levels were summarized in this scoping review. An important next step is to formulate what policy solutions are likely to lead to the greatest improvement in safety and well-being for children and families involved in child welfare.

Keywords: child maltreatment; child protection; child welfare; policy; reform; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. McTavish J.R., MacGregor J.C.D., Wathen C.N., MacMillan H.L. Children’s Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence: An Overview. Int. Rev. Psychiatry. 2016;28:504–518. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2016.1205001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Development of Guidelines for the Health Sector Response to Child Maltreatment. [(accessed on 26 June 2017)]. Available online: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/child/child_maltr...
    1. McCrory E., De Brito S.A., Viding E. The Link between Child Abuse and Psychopathology: A Review of Neurobiological and Genetic Research. J. R. Soc. Med. 2012;105:151–156. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110222. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller G.E., Chen E., Parker K.J. Psychological Stress in Childhood and Susceptibility to the Chronic Diseases of Aging: Moving toward a Model of Behavioral and Biological Mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 2011;137:959–997. doi: 10.1037/a0024768. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naughton A.M., Maguire S.A., Mann M.K., Lumb R.C., Tempest V., Gracias S., Kemp A.M. Emotional, Behavioral, and Developmental Features Indicative of Neglect or Emotional Abuse in Preschool Children: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:769–775. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.192. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types