Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14311.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114311.

Value of Repeat CT Brain in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with High Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Progression

Affiliations

Value of Repeat CT Brain in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with High Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Progression

Farizal Fadzil et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), particularly those at higher risk of having ICH progression, are typically prescribed a second head Computer Tomography (CT) scan to monitor the disease development. This study aimed to evaluate the role of a repeat head CT in MTBI patients at a higher risk of ICH progression by comparing the intervention rate between patients with and without ICH progression.

Methods: 192 patients with MTBI and ICH were treated between November 2019 to December 2020 at a single level II trauma center. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to classify MTBI, and initial head CT was performed according to the Canadian CT head rule. Patients with a higher risk of ICH progression, including the elderly (≥65 years old), patients on antiplatelets or anticoagulants, or patients with an initial head CT that revealed EDH, contusional bleeding, or SDH > 5 mm, and multiple ICH underwent a repeat head CT within 12 to 24 h later. Data regarding types of intervention, length of stay in the hospital, and outcome were collected. The risk of further neurological deterioration and readmission rates were compared between these two groups. All patients were followed up in the clinic after one month or contacted via phone if they did not return.

Results: 189 patients underwent scheduled repeated head CT, 18% had radiological intracranial bleed progression, and 82% had no changes. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of intervention rate, risk of neurological deterioration in the future, or readmission between them.

Conclusion: Repeat head CT in mild TBI patients with no neurological deterioration is not recommended, even in patients with a higher risk of ICH progression.

Keywords: mild traumatic head injury; progression of bleed; scheduled repeat CT brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.

References

    1. Dewan M.C., Rattani A., Gupta S., Baticulon R.E., Hung Y.-C., Punchak M., Agrawal A., Adeleye A.O., Shrime M.G., Rubiano A.M., et al. Estimating the Global Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurosurg. 2019;130:1080–1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) Early Management of Head Injury in Adults. Ministry of Health Malaysia; Putrajaya, Malaysia: 2015.
    1. Reljic T., Mahony H., Djulbegovic B., Etchason J., Paxton H., Flores M., Kumar A. Value of Repeat Head Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurotrauma. 2014;31:78–98. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2873. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alahmadi H., Vachhrajani S., Cusimano M.D. The Natural History of Brain Contusion: An Analysis of Radiological and Clinical Progression. J. Neurosurg. 2010;112:1139–1145. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.JNS081369. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown C.V.R., Weng J., Oh D., Salim A., Kasotakis G., Demetriades D., Velmahos G.C., Rhee P. Does Routine Serial Computed Tomography of the Head Influence Management of Traumatic Brain Injury? A Prospective Evaluation. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care. 2004;57:939–943. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000149492.92558.03. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types