Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 4;11(21):6555.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11216555.

Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models

Affiliations

Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models

Moiz Qureshi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for future actions and plans to cope with the challenge.

Methods: We conduct a side-by-side comparison of the machine learning approach with the traditional time series model. The multilayer perceptron model (MLP), a machine learning technique, and the Box-Jenkins methodology, also known as the ARIMA model, are used for classical modeling. Both methods are applied to the Monkeypox cumulative data set and compared using different model selection criteria such as root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error.

Results: With a root mean square error of 150.78, the monkeypox series follows the ARIMA (7,1,7) model among the other potential models. Comparatively, we use the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, which employs the sigmoid activation function and has a different number of hidden neurons in a single hidden layer. The root mean square error of the MLP model, which uses a single input and ten hidden neurons, is 54.40, significantly lower than that of the ARIMA model. The actual confirmed cases versus estimated or fitted plots also demonstrate that the multilayer perceptron model has a better fit for the monkeypox data than the ARIMA model.

Conclusions and recommendation: When it comes to predicting monkeypox, the machine learning method outperforms the traditional time series. A better match can be achieved in future studies by applying the extreme learning machine model (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), and some other methods with various activation functions. It is thus concluded that the selected data provide a real picture of the virus. If the situations remain the same, governments and other stockholders should ensure the follow-up of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) among the masses, as the trends will continue rising in the upcoming 10 days. However, governments should take some serious interventions to cope with the virus.

Limitation: In the ARIMA models selected for forecasting, we did not incorporate the effect of covariates such as the effect of net migration of monkeypox virus patients, government interventions, etc.

Keywords: ARIMA; MLP; monkeypox; pandemic; time series data analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The four iterative steps of ARIMA models for forecasting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Historigram of the cumulative cases of monkeypox data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlogram of the monkeypox for 1st difference. (a) ACF; (b) Partial ACF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Autocorrelation plot of residuals from ARIMA (7,1,7).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Actual versus fitted plot of ARIMA (7,1,7) for monkeypox data.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Actual versus fitted plot of MLP for monkeypox data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cho C.T., Wenner H.A. Monkeypox virus. Bacteriol. Rev. 1973;37:1–18. doi: 10.1128/br.37.1.1-18.1973. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marennikova S., Šeluhina E.M., Mal’Ceva N., Čimiškjan K., Macevič G. Isolation and properties of the causal agent of a new variola-like disease (monkeypox) in man. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972;46:599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bunge E.M., Hoet B., Chen L., Lienert F., Weidenthaler H., Baer L.R., Steffen R. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox—A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022;16:e0010141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer H., Perrichot M., Stemmler M., Emmerich P., Schmitz H., Varaine F., Shungu R., Tshioko F., Formenty P. Outbreaks of disease suspected of being due to human monkeypox virus infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2001. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40:2919–2921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2919-2921.2002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heymann D.L., Szczeniowski M., Esteves K. Re-emergence of monkeypox in Africa: A review of the past six years. Br. Med. Bull. 1998;54:693–702. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011720. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources