Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;45(6):3507-3520.
doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01430-6. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

COVID-19-associated 2020 lockdown: a study on atmospheric black carbon fall impact on human health

Affiliations

COVID-19-associated 2020 lockdown: a study on atmospheric black carbon fall impact on human health

Pratima Gupta et al. Environ Geochem Health. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

The mean mass concentrations of black carbon (BC), biomass burning (BC)bb, and fossil fuel combustion (BC)ff have been estimated during March-May 2020 (during the COVID-19 outbreak) and March-May 2019 at a semiarid region of Agra over the Indo-Gangetic basin region. The daily mean mass concentration of BC in 2020 and 2019 was 3.9 and 6.9 µg m-3, respectively. The high monthly mean mass concentration of BC was found to be 4.7, 3.4 and 3.3 µg m-3 in Mar-2020, Apr-2020, and May-2020, respectively, whereas in Mar-2019, Apr-2019, and May-2019 was 7.7, 7.5 and 5.4 µg m-3, respectively. The absorption coefficient (babs) and absorption angstrom exponent (AAE) of black carbon were calculated. The highest mean AAE was 1.6 in the year 2020 (Mar-May 2020) indicating the dominance of biomass burning. The mean mass concentration of fossil fuel (BC)ff and biomass burning (BC)bb is 3.4 and 0.51 µg m-3, respectively, in 2020 whereas 6.4 and 0.73 µg m-3, respectively, in 2019. The mean fraction contribution of BC with fossil fuel (BC)ff was 82.1 ± 13.5% and biomass burning (BC)bb was 17.9 ± 4.3% in 2020, while in 2019, fossil fuel (BC)ff was 86.7 ± 13.5% and biomass burning (BC)bb was 13.3 ± 6.7%. The population-weighted mean concentration of BC, fossil fuel (BC)ff, and biomass burning (BC)bb has been calculated. The health risk assessment of BC has been analyzed in the form of attributable relative risk factors and attributed relative risk during the COVID-19 outbreak using AirQ + v.2.0 model. The attributable relative risk factors of BC were 20.6% in 2020 and 29.4% in 2019. The mean attributed relative risk per 10,000,000 populations at 95% confidence interval (CI) due to BC was 184.06 (142.6-225.2) in 2020 and 609.06 (418.3-714.6) in 2019. The low attributed factor and attributed relative risk in 2020 may be attributed to improvements in air quality and a fall in the emission of BC. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the whole country faced the biggest lockdown, ban of the transportation of private vehicles, trains, aircraft, and construction activities, and shut down of the industry leading to a fall in the impact of BC on human health. Overall, this was like a blessing in disguise. This study will help in future planning of mitigation and emission control of air pollutants in large and BC in particular. It only needs a multipronged approach. This study may be like torch bearing to set path for mitigation of impacts of air pollution and improvement of air quality.

Keywords: Air Q + model; Black carbon; Health risk analysis; Source apportionment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no financial interests to authors and institutions. We do not have any conflict of interest. We do not have even any non-financial interests and conflicts.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location map of the study area
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The mean and monthly mass concentration of black carbon in 2019 and 2020 (a), the mean absorption coefficient (babs) of black carbon in 2019 and 2020 (b), and the absorption angstrom exponent (AAE) of black carbon during 2019, 2020, pre-lockdown, Janta curfew, 1st lockdown and 2nd lockdown (c)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The mean mass concentration of fossil fuel (BC)ff and biomass burning (BC)bb during the study period
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The temporal variation n of fossil fuel (BC)ff and biomass burning (BC)bb mass concentration during pre-lockdown (a), Janta curfew (b), 1st lockdown (c), and 2nd lockdown (d)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Percentage contribution (%) of fossil fuel (BC)ff and biomass burning (BC)bb during the study period

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambade B, Sankar TK, Kumar A, Gautam AS, Gautam S. COVID-19 lockdowns reduce the black carbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of the Asian atmosphere: Source apportionment and health hazard evaluation. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021;23(8):12252–12271. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01167-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee T, Murari V, Kumar M, Raju MP. Source apportionment of airborne particulates through receptor modeling: Indian scenario. Atmospheric Research. 2015;164:167–187. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.017. - DOI
    1. Brauer M, et al. Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy, and infections in a birth cohort. European Respiratory Journal. 2007;29:879–888. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00083406. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Central Pollution Control Board, Govt. of India, Delhi. 2020. Impact of janta curfew & lockdown on air quality. https://www.cpcb.nic.in/air/NCR/jantacurfew.pdf.
    1. Doumbia T, et al. Changes in global air pollutant emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A dataset for atmospheric modeling. Earth System Science Data. 2021;13:4191–4206. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-4191-2021. - DOI