Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;68(5):611-619.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.10389. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS With an Automatic Resuscitator

Affiliations

Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS With an Automatic Resuscitator

Mayson LA Sousa et al. Respir Care. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: The Oxylator is an automatic resuscitator, powered only by an oxygen cylinder with no electricity required, that could be used in acute respiratory failure in situations in which standard mechanical ventilation is not available or feasible. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of mechanical ventilation by using this automatic resuscitator in an animal model of ARDS.

Methods: A randomized experimental study in a porcine ARDS model with 12 pigs randomized to the Oxylator group or the control group (6 per group) and ventilated for 4 h. In the Oxylator group, peak pressure was set at 20 cm H2O and PEEP was set at the lowest observed breathing frequency during a decremental PEEP titration. The control pigs were ventilated with a conventional ventilator by using protective settings and PEEP at the crossing point of collapse and overdistention, as indicated by electrical impedance tomography. Our end points were feasibility and safety as well as respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics.

Results: After lung injury, the mean ± SD respiratory system compliance and PaO2 /FIO2 were 13 ± 2 mL/cm H2O and 61 ± 17 mm Hg, respectively. The mean ± SD total PEEP was 10 ± 2 cm H2O and 13 ± 2 cm H2O in the control and Oxylator groups, respectively (P = .046). The mean plateau pressure was kept to < 30 cm H2O in both groups. In the Oxylator group, the tidal volume was transiently > 8 mL/kg but was 6 ± 0.4 mL/kg at 4 h, whereas the breathing frequency increased from 38 ± 4 to 48 ± 3 breaths/min (P < .001). There was no difference in driving pressure, compliance, PaO2 /FIO2 , and pulmonary shunt between the groups. The mean ± SD PaCO2 was higher in the Oxylator group after 4 h, 74 ± 9 mm Hg versus 58 ± 6 mm Hg (P < .001). There were no differences in hemodynamics between the groups, including blood pressure and cardiac output.

Conclusions: Short-term mechanical ventilation by using an automatic resuscitator and a fixed pressure setting in an ARDS animal model was feasible and safe.

Keywords: artificial respiration; mechanical ventilators; rescue ventilation; respiratory distress syndrome; respiratory insufficiency; ventilator-induced lung injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Ventilatory variables. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *Significant values and/or differences (P < .05) for between-group comparisons at a specific time point.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A: Comparison of PEEP titration by using the resuscitator versus conventional ventilator. The black line represents the breathing frequency, according to total PEEP, during PEEP titration when using the resuscitator, and the gray line represents respiratory system compliance (CRS) during PEEP titration on conventional ventilation. Data are presented as mean ± SD. B: Correlation, and C: A Bland-Altman plot of optimal PEEP by breathing frequency on the resuscitator and optimal PEEP by CRS on conventional ventilator. D: Correlation, and E: A Bland-Altman plot of optimal PEEP by breathing frequency on the resuscitator and optimal PEEP by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) on conventional ventilator, based on lung collapse and lung overdistention.

References

    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. . Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395(10223):497–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciceri F, Castagna A, Rovere-Querini P, De Cobelli F, Ruggeri A, Galli L, et al. . Early predictors of clinical outcomes of COVID-19 outbreak in Milan, Italy. Clin Immunol 2020;217(108509):108509. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suleyman G, Fadel RA, Malette KM, Hammond C, Abdulla H, Entz A, et al. . Clinical characteristics and morbidity associated with coronavirus disease 2019 in a series of patients in metropolitan Detroit. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(6):e2012270. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Definition Task Force ARDS Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. . Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307(23):2526–2533. - PubMed
    1. Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, et al. . Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382(21):2049–2055. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources