Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 11;32(1):51.
doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00304-9.

Evaluation of telehealth support in an integrated respiratory clinic

Lauren Fox #  1 , Emily Heiden #  2 , Milan A J Chauhan  2 , Jayne M Longstaff  2 , Lara Balls  2 , Ruth De Vos  2   3 , Daniel M Neville  2   3 , Thomas L Jones  2   3 , Anthony W Leung  4 , Lydia Morrison  2 , Hitasha Rupani  2   3 , Thomas P Brown  2   3 , Rebecca Stores  5 , Anoop J Chauhan  2   3   5
Affiliations

Evaluation of telehealth support in an integrated respiratory clinic

Lauren Fox et al. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. .

Abstract

Supporting self-management is key in improving disease control, with technology increasingly utilised. We hypothesised the addition of telehealth support following assessment in an integrated respiratory clinic could reduce unscheduled healthcare visits in patients with asthma and COPD. Following treatment optimisation, exacerbation-prone participants or those with difficulty in self-management were offered telehealth support. This comprised automated twice-weekly telephone calls, with a specialist nurse triaging alerts. We performed a matched cohort study assessing additional benefits of the telehealth service, matching by: confirmed diagnosis, age, sex, FEV1 percent predicted, smoking status and ≥1 exacerbation in the last year. Thirty-four telehealth participants were matched to twenty-nine control participants. The telehealth cohort generated 165 alerts, with 29 participants raising at least one alert; 88 (53.5%) alerts received a call discussing self-management, of which 35 (21%) received definitive advice that may otherwise have required an unscheduled healthcare visit. There was a greater reduction in median exacerbation rate across both telehealth groups at 6 months post-intervention (1 to 0, p < 0.001) but not in control groups (0.5 to 0.0, p = 0.121). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in unscheduled GP visits across the telehealth groups (1.5 to 0.0, p < 0.001), but not the control groups (0.5 to 0.0, p = 0.115). These reductions led to cost-savings across all groups, but greater in the telehealth cohorts. The addition of telehealth support to exacerbation-prone patients with asthma or COPD, following comprehensive assessment and treatment optimisation, proved beneficial in reducing exacerbation frequency and unscheduled healthcare visits and thus leads to significant cost-savings for the NHS.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03096509.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.L. reports fees from Astra Zeneca for education delivery. T.L.J. reports non-financial support from Chiesi outside the submitted work. H.R. reports honoraria and lecture fees from Astra Zeneca, TEVA, Novartis, Glaxo Smith Kline and Chiesi, all of which are outside of the submitted work. T.P.B. reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Glaxo Smith Kline, personal fees and non-financial support from Teva, non-financial support from Napp Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, outside the submitted work. A.J.C. reports honoraria and lecture fees from TEVA, Astra Zeneca and Sanofi, and research grants from Airsonett, Novartis and Glaxo Smith Kline, all of which are outside of the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow-chart demonstrating participant recruitment.
Following a review in a MISSION-ABC clinic, one participant did not meet the inclusion criteria of a confirmed diagnosis of asthma or COPD.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Snell, N. et al. Burden of lung disease in the UK; findings from the British Lung Foundation’s ‘respiratory health of the nation’ project. Eur. Respir. J.48, (Suppl 60) (2016). - PubMed
    1. Trueman, D., Woodcock, F. & Hancock, E. Estimating the economic burden of respiratory illness in the UK. Br. Lung Found. 4 (2017).
    1. British Lung Foundation (BLF). Out in the cold: lung disease, the hidden driver of NHS winter pressure. 1–34 (2017).
    1. The NHS Long Term Plan. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/
    1. Pinnock, H. et al. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective. BMC Medicine 15:64 (BMC Medicine, 2017). - PMC - PubMed

Associated data