Experiences of midwifery care in English prisons
- PMID: 36370038
- DOI: 10.1111/birt.12692
Experiences of midwifery care in English prisons
Abstract
Background: In the United Kingdom (UK), all prisoners must receive healthcare equivalent to that available in the community. However, evidence suggests that equality in healthcare provision for perinatal women in UK prisons is not always achieved. The aim of this research was to examine pregnant women prisoners' and custody staffs' experiences and perceptions of midwifery care in English prisons.
Methods: A qualitative approach based on institutional ethnography was used to research women's experiences in three English prisons over a period of 10 months. In total, 28 women participated in audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews. Ten staff members were interviewed, including six prison service staff and four health care personnel. Ten months of prison fieldwork enabled observations of everyday prison life. NVivo was used for data organization with an inductive thematic analysis method.
Results: Women's experiences included: disempowerment due to limited choice; fear of birthing alone; and a lack of information about rights, with a sense of not receiving entitlements. Some women reported favorably on the continuity of midwifery care provided. There was confusion around the statutory role of UK midwifery.
Discussion: Experiences of perinatal prisoners contrast starkly with best midwifery practice-women are unable to choose their care provider, their birth companions, or their place of birth. In addition, a reliance upon "good behavior" in return for appropriate treatment may be detrimental to the health, safety, and well-being of the pregnant woman and her unborn baby.
Conclusion: Prison is an adverse environment for a pregnant woman. This study provides key insights into imprisoned women's experiences of midwifery care in England and shows that midwives play an essential role in ensuring that perinatal prisoners receive safe, high-quality, respectful care.
Keywords: institutions; midwifery; pregnancy; prison; women's health.
© 2022 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Reflections on researcher departure: Closure of prison relationships in ethnographic research.Nurs Ethics. 2019 Aug;26(5):1424-1441. doi: 10.1177/0969733017747959. Epub 2018 Feb 19. Nurs Ethics. 2019. PMID: 29458312 Free PMC article.
-
Patients, prisoners, or people? Women prisoners' experiences of primary care in prison: a qualitative study.Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Sep;58(554):630-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X330771. Br J Gen Pract. 2008. PMID: 18801272 Free PMC article.
-
Complexities of midwifery care delivered to perinatal women in prison: A qualitative study.Midwifery. 2024 Sep;136:104099. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104099. Epub 2024 Jul 3. Midwifery. 2024. PMID: 39004043
-
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024. Int J Prison Health. 2014. PMID: 25764177 Review.
-
Pregnant in prison: An integrative literature review.Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 30559007 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual and reproductive health needs of incarcerated women in Iran.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91200-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39984704 Free PMC article.
-
How are the Dietary Needs of Pregnant Incarcerated Women Being Met? A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.Matern Child Health J. 2024 Feb;28(2):253-266. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03884-1. Epub 2024 Feb 11. Matern Child Health J. 2024. PMID: 38341837 Free PMC article.
-
Labor and childbirth care for women deprived of liberty: a scoping review.Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Sep 13;58:e20240035. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0035en. eCollection 2024. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024. PMID: 39303703 Free PMC article.
References
-
- United Nations General Assembly (2016) United Nations standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules). https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BangkokRules-Upda... [accessed 13th January 2021].
-
- Council of Europe. Committee of Ministers. (2006) European Prison Rules. Council of Europe. Recommendation Rec. 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the European Prison Rules.
-
- Niveau G. Relevance and limits of the principle of “Equivalence of Care” in prison medicine. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(10):610-613.
-
- Ross, M. W. (2013) Health and Health Promotion in Prisons: Routledge.
-
- Davies, M., Rolewicz, L., Schlepper, L. and Fagunwa, F., (2020) Locked out? Prisoners’ use of hospital care. Research summary. https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2020-02/prisoners-use-of-hospital... [accessed 12th March 2021]
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources