Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study
- PMID: 36370457
- PMCID: PMC9854294
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13657
Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study
Abstract
Introduction: Making a diagnosis of asthma can be challenging for clinicians and patients. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) for use in primary care including a patient-facing mode, could change how information is shared between patients and healthcare professionals and improve the diagnostic process.
Methods: Participants diagnosed with asthma within the last 5 years were recruited from general practices across four UK regions. In-depth interviews were used to explore patient experiences relating to their asthma diagnosis and to understand how a CDSS could be used to improve the diagnostic process for patients. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach.
Results: Seventeen participants (12 female) undertook interviews, including 14 individuals and 3 parents of children with asthma. Being diagnosed with asthma was generally considered an uncertain process. Participants felt a lack of consultation time and poor communication affected their understanding of asthma and what to expect. Had the nature of asthma and the steps required to make a diagnosis been explained more clearly, patients felt their understanding and engagement in asthma self-management could have been improved. Participants considered that a CDSS could provide resources to support the diagnostic process, prompt dialogue, aid understanding and support shared decision-making.
Conclusion: Undergoing an asthma diagnosis was uncertain for patients if their ideas and concerns were not addressed by clinicians and were influenced by a lack of consultation time and limitations in communication. An asthma diagnosis CDSS could provide structure and an interface to prompt dialogue, provide visuals about asthma to aid understanding and encourage patient involvement.
Patient and public contribution: Prespecified semistructured interview topic guides (young person and adult versions) were developed by the research team and piloted with members of the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) group. Findings were regularly discussed within the research group and with PPI colleagues to aid the interpretation of data.
Keywords: GPs and asthma nurses; asthma diagnosis; clinical decision support system (cdss); patient perspectives; primary care.
© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Use and acceptability of an asthma diagnosis clinical decision support system for primary care clinicians: an observational mixed methods study.NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 Nov 27;34(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00401-x. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024. PMID: 39604378 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician views on how clinical decision support systems can help diagnose asthma in primary care: a qualitative study.J Asthma. 2024 Apr;61(4):377-385. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2280839. Epub 2023 Nov 11. J Asthma. 2024. PMID: 37934476
-
Promoting the implementation of clinical decision support systems in primary care: A qualitative exploration of implementing a Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)-guided decision support system in asthma consultations.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0317613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317613. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39946372 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of parents and carers in managing asthma in children: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 May;17(5):793-984. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004019. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31090652
-
Defining high probability when making a diagnosis of asthma in primary care: mixed-methods consensus workshop.BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 20;10(4):e034559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034559. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32317260 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14039. doi: 10.1111/hex.14039. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 38613765 Free PMC article.
-
Use and acceptability of an asthma diagnosis clinical decision support system for primary care clinicians: an observational mixed methods study.NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 Nov 27;34(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00401-x. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024. PMID: 39604378 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 17;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01445-4. Implement Sci. 2025. PMID: 40671071 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic health record-based behaviour change interventions aimed at general practitioners in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review using behaviour change theory.BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e080546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080546. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38816046 Free PMC article.
-
Prioritising universal access to respiratory diagnostics.Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Nov 30;73(737):532-533. doi: 10.3399/bjgp23X735573. Print 2023 Dec. Br J Gen Pract. 2023. PMID: 38035804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Aaron SD, Vandemheen KL, FitzGerald JM, et al. Reevaluation of diagnosis in adults with physician‐diagnosed asthma. JAMA. 2017;317(3):269‐279. - PubMed
-
- José BPS, Camargos PAM, Cruz Filho ÁAS, Corrêa RA. Diagnostic accuracy of respiratory diseases in primary health units. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2014;60(6):599‐612. - PubMed
-
- Health Improvement Scotland. BTS/SIGN British Guideline for the Management of Asthma. SIGN 158. Health Improvement Scotland; 2019. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-158-british-guideline-on-the-management-of-a...