Qualitative study using grounded theory examining collegiality among emergency physicians

Abstract

Objectives: Collegiality is considered to be any extra-role behaviour that is discretionary, not recognised by a formal reward system and that promotes the effective functioning of the organisation. Although there is much literature on the concept of collegiality, there are few studies examining collegiality in the medical profession and none looking at collegiality among emergency physicians (EPs). The aim of the present study is to explore the perceptions of different ED healthcare professionals on the meaning of collegiality among EPs, the benefits of collegiality and behaviours they identify as indicative of collegiality.

Methods: This was a qualitative study using grounded theory. Data collection was via focus group interviews of three to four participants per group. Participants included EPs, emergency medicine trainees, senior emergency nurses and nurse practitioners. Three questions were explored: 'what does collegiality mean to you?'; 'what are the benefits of collegiality?'; and 'what specific behaviours do you see as part of collegiality?'

Results: Ten focus group interviews involving a total of 33 participants were conducted. Several themes were identified for both the meaning of collegiality and the benefits of collegiality among EPs. Eight themes regarding collegial behaviour were identified: (i) mutual respect and trust; (ii) mutual support; (iii) attitude; (iv) work ethic; (v) staff welfare; (vi) patient management; (vii) handover; and (viii) education.

Conclusion: The present study identified distinct themes and behaviours indicative of collegiality among EPs. Promoting these behaviours could improve staff well-being, ED efficiency, patient safety and productivity.

Keywords: emergency medicine; focus group; interdisciplinary health team; professionalism; qualitative research.