Accuracy and prognostic impact of FDG PET/CT and biopsy in bone marrow assessment of follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: A Nation-Wide cohort study
- PMID: 36373169
- PMCID: PMC10067085
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5424
Accuracy and prognostic impact of FDG PET/CT and biopsy in bone marrow assessment of follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: A Nation-Wide cohort study
Abstract
Backgound: In the workup of follicular lymphoma (FL), bone marrow biopsy (BMB) assessment is a key component of FLIPI and FLIPI2, the most widely used outcome scores. During the previous decade, several studies explored the role of FDG-PET/CT for detecting nodal and extranodal disease, with only one large study comparing both techniques.
Methods: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic impact of both procedures in a retrospective cohort of 299 FL patients with both tests performed at diagnosis. In order to avoid a collinearity bias, FLIPI2 was deconstructed in its founding parameters, and the bone marrow involvement (BMI) parameter separately included as: a positive BMB, a positive PET/CT, the combined "PET/CT and BMB positive" or "PET/CT or BMB positive". These variables were also confronted independently with the POD24 in 233 patients treated with intensive regimens.
Results: In the total cohort, bone marrow was involved in 124 and 60 patients by BMB and PET/CT, respectively. In terms of overall survival, age > 60 y.o. and the combined "PET/CT or BMB positive" achieved statistical independence as a prognostic factor. In patients treated with an intensive regimen, only the combined "PET/CT or BMB positive" added prognostic value for a shorter overall survival, when confronted with the POD24.
Conclusion: Our results show that in FL both BMB and PET/CT should be considered at diagnosis, as their combined assessment provides independent prognostic value in the context of the most widely use clinical scores.
Keywords: PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy; follicular lymphoma.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
J.T.N. discloses honoraria from Novartis and Roche; consulting or advisory role in Novartis, Blueprint Medicines and EUSA Pharma; research funding from Gilead and EUSA Pharma. A.S: Roche (Research Funding, Speakers Bureau), Janssen (Consultancy, Speakers Bureau), Gilead (Research Funding), Celgene/BMS (Consultancy), EUSA Pharma (Consultancy), Beigene (Consultancy). A.J. reports a research grant from Gilead and consultancy honoraria from Novartis and Celgene, all outside of the submitted work. The rest of the authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Federico M, Luminari S, Dondi A, et al. R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP versus R‐FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced‐stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(12):1506‐1513. - PubMed
-
- Marcus R, Davies A, Ando K, et al. Obinutuzumab for the first‐line treatment of follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1331‐1344. - PubMed
-
- Salles G, Seymour JF, Offner F, et al. Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):42‐51. - PubMed
-
- Solal‐Céligny P, Roy P, Colombat P, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood. 2004;104(5):1258‐1265. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
