The rhizosphere microbiome and host plant glucosinolates exhibit feedback cycles in Brassica rapa
- PMID: 36373270
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.16782
The rhizosphere microbiome and host plant glucosinolates exhibit feedback cycles in Brassica rapa
Abstract
The rhizosphere microbiome influences many aspects of plant fitness, including production of secondary compounds and defence against insect herbivores. Plants also modulate the composition of the microbial community in the rhizosphere via secretion of root exudates. We tested both the effect of the rhizosphere microbiome on plant traits, and host plant effects on rhizosphere microbes using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of Brassica rapa that differ in production of glucosinolates (GLS), secondary metabolites that contribute to defence against insect herbivores. First, we investigated the effect of genetic variation in GLS production on the composition of the rhizosphere microbiome. Using a Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial regression model (DMBVS), we identified both negative and positive associations between bacteria from six genera and the concentration of five GLS compounds produced in plant roots. Additionally, we tested the effects of microbial inoculation (an intact vs. disrupted soil microbiome) on GLS production and insect damage in these RILs. We found a significant microbial treatment × genotype interaction, in which total GLS was higher in the intact relative to the disrupted microbiome treatment in some RILs. However, despite differences in GLS production between microbial treatments, we observed no difference in insect damage between treatments. Together, these results provide evidence for a full feedback cycle of plant-microbe interactions mediated by GLS; that is, GLS compounds produced by the host plant "feed-down" to influence rhizosphere microbial community and rhizosphere microbes "feed-up" to influence GLS production.
Keywords: glucosinolates; insect; microbiome; plant-soil feedback; rhizosphere.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Agerbirk, N., & Olsen, C. E. (2012). Glucosinolate structures in evolution. Phytochemistry, 77, 16-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.005
-
- Aires, A., Mota, V. R., Saavedra, M. J., Monteiro, A. A., Simões, M., Rosa, E. A. S., & Bennett, R. N. (2009). Initial in vitro evaluations of the antibacterial activities of glucosinolate enzymatic hydrolysis products against plant pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 106(6), 2096-2105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04181.x
-
- Anthony, M. A., Celenza, J. L., Armstrong, A., & Frey, S. D. (2020). Indolic glucosinolate pathway provides resistance to mycorrhizal fungal colonization in a non-host Brassicaceae. Ecosphere, 11(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3100
-
- Badri, D. V., Zolla, G., Bakker, M. G., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2013). Potential impact of soil microbiomes on the leaf metabolome and on herbivore feeding behavior. New Phytologist, 198(1), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12124
-
- Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006). The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57(1), 233-266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous