Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar;21(2):167-193.
doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00761-w. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

The Role of Mental Health on Workplace Productivity: A Critical Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

The Role of Mental Health on Workplace Productivity: A Critical Review of the Literature

Claire de Oliveira et al. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Mental health disorders in the workplace have increasingly been recognised as a problem in most countries given their high economic burden. However, few reviews have examined the relationship between mental health and worker productivity.

Objective: To review the relationship between mental health and lost productivity and undertake a critical review of the published literature.

Methods: A critical review was undertaken to identify relevant studies published in MEDLINE and EconLit from 1 January 2008 to 31 May 2020, and to examine the type of data and methods employed, study findings and limitations, and existing gaps in the literature. Studies were critically appraised, namely whether they recognised and/or addressed endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity, and a narrative synthesis of the existing evidence was undertaken.

Results: Thirty-eight (38) relevant studies were found. There was clear evidence that poor mental health (mostly measured as depression and/or anxiety) was associated with lost productivity (i.e., absenteeism and presenteeism). However, only the most common mental disorders were typically examined. Studies employed questionnaires/surveys and administrative data and regression analysis. Few studies used longitudinal data, controlled for unobserved heterogeneity or addressed endogeneity; therefore, few studies were considered high quality.

Conclusion: Despite consistent findings, more high-quality, longitudinal and causal inference studies are needed to provide clear policy recommendations. Moreover, future research should seek to understand how working conditions and work arrangements as well as workplace policies impact presenteeism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Studies by mental disorder. ADHD attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Studies by workplace outcome

References

    1. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E, et al. The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2011.
    1. Hamberg-van Reenen HH, Proper KI, van den Berg M. Worksite mental health interventions: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:837–845. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100668. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton WN, Schultz AB, Chen C, Edington DW. The association of worker productivity and mental health: a review of the literature. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2008;1(2):78–94. doi: 10.1108/17538350810893883. - DOI
    1. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T, editors. Mental health and wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2016.
    1. Mental wellbeing at work. Public health guideline [PH22]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2009. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph22 (Accessed 28 July 2021).