Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;25(1):43-55.
doi: 10.1111/bdi.13271. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Bipolar I and bipolar II subtypes in older age: Results from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) project

Affiliations

Bipolar I and bipolar II subtypes in older age: Results from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) project

Alexandra J M Beunders et al. Bipolar Disord. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The distinction between bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and bipolar II disorder (BD-II) has been a topic of long-lasting debate. This study examined differences between BD-I and BD-II in a large, global sample of OABD, focusing on general functioning, cognition and somatic burden as these domains are often affected in OABD.

Methods: Cross-sectional analyses were conducted with data from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) database. The sample included 963 participants aged ≥50 years (714 BD-I, 249 BD-II). Sociodemographic and clinical factors were compared between BD subtypes including adjustment for study cohort. Multivariable analyses were conducted with generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and estimated associations between BD subtype and (1) general functioning (GAF), (2) cognitive performance (g-score) and (3) somatic burden, with study cohort as random intercept.

Results: After adjustment for study cohort, BD-II patients more often had a late onset ≥50 years (p = 0.008) and more current severe depression (p = 0.041). BD-I patients were more likely to have a history of psychiatric hospitalization (p < 0.001) and current use of anti-psychotics (p = 0.003). Multivariable analyses showed that BD subtype was not related to GAF, cognitive g-score or somatic burden.

Conclusion: BD-I and BD-II patients did not differ in terms of general functioning, cognitive impairment or somatic burden. Some clinical differences were observed between the groups, which could be the consequence of diagnostic definitions. The distinction between BD-I and BD-II is not the best way to subtype OABD patients. Future research should investigate other disease specifiers in this population.

Keywords: bipolar disorder; cognition; comorbidities; diagnostic subtypes; elderly; functioning; geriatrics; impairment; older-age bipolar disorder (OABD); psychiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alexandra Beunders, Almar Kok, Sigfried Schouws, Ralph Kupka, Farren Briggs, Lisa Eyler, Orestes Forlenza, Ariel Gildengers, Kaylee Sarna, Ashley Sutherland, Joy Yala, Luca Villa, Nicole Korten and Annemiek Dols have no conflicts to report. Federica Klaus has no conflict of interest to report, but receives an Early. Postdoc Mobility Fellowship of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (grant number P2ZHP3_181506) and Novartis Foundation for Medical‐Biological Research Fellowship. Hilary Blumberg received an honorarium from Aetna for a presentation. Brent Forester has received research grants from Biogen, Eisai, The Rogers Family Foundation, The Spier Family Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. He has previously served as a consultant for Acadia Pharmaceuticals and Biogen. He currently serves on the Advisory Board for Patina Health and the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee for CVS Health. Esther Jiménez declares no conflict of interest but has a research grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PI20/00060)). Benoit Mulsant receives compensation from the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario; and the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dr Mulsant is a member of the Board of Trustees, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario. Dr Mulsant currently receives research support from Brain Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the CAMH Foundation, the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), the US National Institute of Health (NIH), Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Capital Solution Design LLC, and HAPPYneuron. He has also received research support from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Pfizer. He directly owns stocks of General Electric. Regan Patrick receives partial salary support from Rogers Family Foundation, Biogen and NIH/NIA. Soham Rej receives salary support from a clinician‐investigator award from the Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé (FRQS) and owns shares in Aifred Health. Martha Sajatovic has received the following research grants within the past 3 years: Nuromate, Otsuka, International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). In the past year, she has been a consultant for Alkermes, Otsuka, Sunovion, Janssen, Lundbeck, Teva, Clinical Education Alliance, and Health Analytics. In the past year, she received royalties from Springer Press, Johns Hopkins University Press, Oxford Press, and UpToDate. She received compensation for preparation of/participation in CME activities in the past year from the American Physician's Institute (CMEtoGo, Psychopharmacology Institute, Novus, American Epilepsy Society, American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Eduard Vieta has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: AB‐Biotics, Abbott, Allergan, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Celon, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Farmindustria, Ferrer, Forest Research Institute, Gedeon Richter, GH Research, Glaxo‐Smith‐Kline, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sage, Sanofi‐Aventis, Servier, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, the Brain and Behaviour Foundation, the Generalitat de Catalunya (PERIS), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM), EU Horizon 2020 and the Stanley Medical Research Institute.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of BD subtypes per participating study. Notes: BD, bipolar disorder; CAE, “Treatment Adherence Enhancement in Bipolar Disorder” study; CiBS_XR, “Cognition in Bipolar Disorder XR” study; Cog‐BD, “Cognition in Euthymic Older Adults with Bipolar Disorder” study; DOBi 1, “Dutch Older Bipolar cohort study,” wave 1; DOBi 2, “Dutch Older Bipolar cohort study,” wave 2; GERI‐SAD, “Open‐label, Prospective Trial of Lamotrigine for Symptoms of Geriatric Bipolar Depression” study; GMDD, “Geriatric Psychiatry Mood Disorders Research Database”; Inflammaging, “Dynamic Inflammatory and Mood Predictors of Cognitive Aging in Bipolar Disorder” study; McGLIDICS, “The McGill Geriatric Lithium‐Induced Diabetes Insipidus Clinical Study”; OABD_S, “Cognitive Impairment and dementia in late life bipolar disorder” study; OPT‐BD, “Asenapine in the Treatment of Older Adults with Bipolar Disorder” study; UBBDPC, “University of Barcelona's Bipolar Disorder Program Cohort”; UPMC, “The Effect of Bipolar Disorder and its Comorbidities on Cognition in Older Adults” study; Yale, “Mood Disorders Research Program Database”; ZIP‐AD, “Ziprasidone switching in response to adherence in psychotropic‐related weight gain concerns among patients with bipolar disorder” study.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Publishing , ed. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Ed.). American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, et al. The comparative clinical phenotype and long term longitudinal episode course of bipolar I and II: a clinical spectrum or distinct disorders? J Affect Disord. 2003;73(1–2):19‐32. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00324-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker G, Spoelma MJ, Tavella G, et al. Categorical differentiation of the unipolar and bipolar disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2021;297:297. doi:10.1016/J.PSYCHRES.2021.113719 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker G. Polarised views about bipolar disorder(s): a critique of the 2020 college guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021;55(6):548‐552. doi:10.1177/00048674211020095 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malhi GS. Thing one and thing two 1: what “doctors use” to doctor you? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021;55(6):536‐547. doi:10.1177/00048674211022602 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types