Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):e062361.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062361.

Does reverse mentoring work in the NHS: a feasibility study of clinicians in practice

Affiliations

Does reverse mentoring work in the NHS: a feasibility study of clinicians in practice

Suneil A Raju et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of reverse mentoring of consultants by junior doctors.

Design: A feasibility study divided into two phases: first a semistructured interview where performance of participating consultants was assessed by junior doctors and then a second phase allowing for feedback to be given on a one-to-one basis. Data collected through questionnaires with free text questions and Likert scores.

Setting: Tertiary teaching hospital in the UK.

Participants: Six junior doctors (66.6% male, age range 31-40 years) and five consultants (80% male, age range 35-65 years and consultants for 5-20 years).

Intervention: Reverse mentoring session.

Main outcome measure: The concerns and/or benefits of the process of reverse mentoring. Confidence was assessed in 7 domains: clinical practice, approach to juniors, approachability, use of technology, time management, strengths and areas for improvement using Likert scales giving a total out of 35.

Results: The most common concerns cited were overcoming the hierarchical difference and a selection bias in both mentors and mentees. However, no participant experienced this hierarchical difference through the reverse mentoring process and no relationships were negatively affected. Mentors became more confident in feeding back to seniors (23 vs 29 out of 35, p=0.04) most evident in clinical practice and areas to improve (3 vs 4 out of 5, p=0.041 and 3 vs 5 out of 5, p=0.041, respectively).

Conclusion: We present the first study of reverse mentoring in an NHS clinical setting. Initial concerns with regard to damaged relationships and hierarchical gradients were not experienced and all participants perceived that they benefited from the process. Reverse mentoring can play a role in engaging and training future leaders at junior stages and provide a means for consultants to receive valuable feedback from junior colleagues.

Keywords: education & training (see medical education & training); general medicine (see internal medicine); medical education & training; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of reverse mentoring model used.

References

    1. Greengard S. Moving forward with reverse mentoring. Workforce 2002;81:15.
    1. Harvey M, Buckley MR. Assessing the “Conventional Wisdoms” of Management for the 21st Century Organization. Organ Dyn 2002;30:368–78. 10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00062-1 - DOI
    1. Marcinkus Murphy W, Murphy W. Reverse mentoring at work: fostering cross-generational learning and developing millennial leaders. Hum Resour Manage 2012;51:549–73. 10.1002/hrm.21489 - DOI
    1. Hewlett S. Let Gen Y teach you tech: Harvard business review, 2009. Available: https://hbr.org/2009/06/let-gen-y-teach-you-tech
    1. Clarke AJ, Burgess A, van Diggele C, et al. . The role of reverse mentoring in medical education: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019;10:693–701. 10.2147/AMEP.S179303 - DOI - PMC - PubMed