Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):153.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00748-9.

Evaluating complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) as a response criterion in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

Affiliations

Evaluating complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) as a response criterion in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

Andrew M Brunner et al. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with DNMTI therapy have responses according to the 2006 IWG response criteria. CR responses have had the strongest association with OS. Recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh; i.e. blasts <5%, ANC > 500, platelets > 50) has been evaluated in AML, but its relevance is unknown in MDS. We identified adult patients with MDS treated with DNMTIs. We assessed best overall response to therapy according to IWG 2006 criteria, and subsequently identified patients meeting CRh criteria from the subgroup with SD or mCR. We evaluated duration of therapy and overall survival according to response. We identified 311 patients with MDS who received treatment between 2007 and 2018. The median age at the time of therapy was 69 years (range 23-91). Median follow up was 60 months. According to IWG 2006, responses included CR (n = 43, 14%), PR (n = 2, 1%), mCR (n = 57, 18%), SD (n = 149, 48%) and PD (n = 60, 19%). 79 patients (25%) achieved HI. A total of 62 patients (20%) met CRh criteria leading to reclassification of mCR (now n = 26, 8%) or SD (now n = 118, 38%). Patients achieving CR had similar time on therapy (median 8.1mo) compared to CRh (median 6mo, HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.0), and longer than other responses (p < 0.001). OS varied according to response; median OS was similar between CR (23.3mo) and CRh (25mo, HR 1.28 [0.79-2.08]), which was longer than those with mCR (17.2mo, HR 1.71 [0.96-3.05]), SD (16.3mo, HR 1.61 [1.04-2.48]), and PD (8.7mo, HR 3.04 [1.91-4.83]) (p < 0.001). OS associations with CR/CRh were confirmed in multivariable analysis accounting for allogeneic transplant. MDS patients who achieve a CRh response had similar survival and duration on therapy as patients who achieve CR response and superior to other IWG responses. These data support further evaluation of CRh into future response criteria and clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AMB: Funding by the Edward P. Evans Foundation and the NIH SCI SPORE. Consulting fees for Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Taiho: Consultancy. RK: BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy. AZ: Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy; Ionis: Consultancy; Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; BeyondSpring: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Jasper: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding. DAS: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Aprea: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Intellia: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. General classification of responses according to IWG 2006 response criteria (left) and when adding CRh as a response (right).
Patients with marrow complete remission or stable disease were reclassified as CRh if, during therapy, they met the criteria for this metric.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Overall survival from the time of therapy initial until death or last known alive, among patients treated with DNMTI therapy.
Survival is shown according to the best overall response on DNMTI therapy (IWG 2006 criteria). Patients with CR as the BOR had prolonged survival compared to mCR, SD, and PD (p < 0.001).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Overall survival from the time of therapy initial until death or last known alive, among patients treated with DNMTI therapy.
Survival is shown according to the best overall response on DNMTI therapy (IWG 2006 criteria) but including patients who met CRh and reclassifying them from patients who met mCR or SD. Median OS was similar between CR (23.3mo) and CRh (25mo). This was longer than patients whose best response remained classified as mCR (17.2mo), SD (16.3mo), and PD (8.7mo) (p < 0.001).

References

    1. Brunner AM, Steensma DP. Recent advances in the cellular and molecular understanding of myelodysplastic syndromes: implications for new therapeutic approaches. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2018;16:56–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindsley RC, Ebert BL. Molecular pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013;8:21–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steensma DP. Graphical representation of clinical outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57:17–20. - PubMed
    1. Zeidan AM, Stahl M, Hu X, Wang R, Huntington SF, Podoltsev NA, et al. Long-term survival of older patients with MDS treated with HMA therapy without subsequent stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2017. 10.1182/blood-2017-10-811729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakamura R, Saber W, Martens MJ, Ramirez A, Scott B, Oran B, et al. Biologic assignment trial of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients 50-75 years of age with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3328–39. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources