Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct;9(4):460-466.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

Phalloplasty following penectomy for penile cancer

Wai Gin Lee  1   2 , A Nim Christopher  1   2 , David J Ralph  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Phalloplasty following penectomy for penile cancer

Wai Gin Lee et al. Asian J Urol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Penile reconstruction or phalloplasty following penectomy can be offered where the functional penile length is inadequate for a man to void while standing or to have sexual intercourse. Phalloplasty is usually staged due to the complex surgical techniques required. This narrative review describes the technical concepts and summarises the contemporary outcomes following phalloplasty in this challenging cohort.

Methods: A retrospective review of the English literature was performed between January 1946 till November 2021. The data were synthesised and complemented by the expert opinion of the authors with 20 years of experience in this field. The flaps are ideally designed with an integrated urethra or alternatively, a further free flap urethroplasty can be offered. Phalloplasty is further complicated following penectomy by scarring from the previous surgery and the potential loss of structures that would normally be present at the recipient site.

Results: There are limited published data with a total of 19 men recorded in the literature. Only the radial artery forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh flap have been described in this cohort of patients. Functional outcomes including standing micturition, sensation in the neophallus, and the ability to orgasm are good. Overall quality of life and satisfaction was also good despite the high risk for long-term complications of the neophallus and donor site.

Conclusion: Phalloplasty following penectomy requires microsurgical transfer of a free flap or a pedicled flap to reconstruct a neophallus. An erectile device is inserted at a later stage to facilitate sexual intercourse, if desired. Surgical scarring from penectomy and the potential loss of vasculature that would normally be present at the recipient site may further complicate reconstruction. Surgical and functional outcomes are acceptable based on the limited published experience to date.

Keywords: Humans; Male; Myocutaneous flap or transplantation; Penis or surgery; Phalloplasty; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Retrospective study; Surgical flap; Thigh or surgery; Treatment outcome; Urethra or surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single cylinder device prepared with Dacron™ cap in place.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The neophallus deflated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The neophallus inflated.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bogoraz N. [Über die volle plastische Wiederherstellung eines zum Koitus fähigen Penis (Peniplastica totalis)] Zentralbl Chir. 1936;22:1271–1276. [Article in German].
    1. Schulteiss D., Gabouev A.I., Jonas U., Nikolaj A. Bogoraz (1874–1952): pioneer of phallosplasty and penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2005;2:139–146. - PubMed
    1. Doornaert M., Hoebeke P., Ceulemans P., Tsjoen G., Heylens G., Monstrey S. Penile reconstruction with the radial forearm flap: an update. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011;43:208–214. - PubMed
    1. Lee W.G., Christopher N., Ralph D.J. Penile reconstruction and the role of surgery in gender dysphoria. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5:337–339. - PubMed
    1. Danker S., Esmonde N., JU Berli. "Staging" in phalloplasty. Urol Clin. 2019;46:581–590. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources