Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Oct 13;2022(4):hoac046.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac046. eCollection 2022.

Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility?

Affiliations
Editorial

Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility?

Laxmi Shingshetty et al. Hum Reprod Open. .

Abstract

The treatment of unexplained infertility is a contentious topic that continues to attract a great deal of interest amongst clinicians, patients and policy makers. The inability to identify an underlying pathology makes it difficult to devise effective treatments for this condition. Couples with unexplained infertility can conceive on their own and any proposed intervention needs to offer a better chance of having a baby. Over the years, several prognostic and prediction models based on routinely collected clinical data have been developed, but these are not widely used by clinicians and patients. In this opinion paper, we propose a prognosis-based approach such that a decision to access treatment is based on the estimated chances of natural and treatment-related conception, which, in the same couple, can change over time. This approach avoids treating all couples as a homogeneous group and minimizes unnecessary treatment whilst ensuring access to those who need it early.

Keywords: assisted conception; expectant management; live birth; prediction models; spontaneous pregnancy; treatment; unexplained infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andaur Navarro CL, Damen JAA, Takada T, Nijman SWJ, Dhiman P, Ma J, Collins GS, Bajpai R, Riley RD, Moons KGM et al Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review. BMJ 2021;375:n2281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bensdorp AJ, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Habbema JDF, Hompes PGA, Bossuyt PMM, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Eijkemans MJC; CECERM Study Group. A revised prediction model for natural conception. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34:619–626. - PubMed
    1. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, King K, Kvaskoff M, Nap A, Petersen K, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis, Hum Reprod Open 2022;2022:hoac009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, Ratna MB, van Eekelen R, Mol BW, McLernon DJ.. Prioritizing IVF treatment in the post-COVID 19 era: a predictive modelling study based on UK national data. Hum Reprod 2021;36:666–675. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bostofte E, Bagger P, Michael A, Stakemann G.. Fertility prognosis for infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1993;59:102–107. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources