Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility?
- PMID: 36382011
- PMCID: PMC9662706
- DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac046
Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility?
Abstract
The treatment of unexplained infertility is a contentious topic that continues to attract a great deal of interest amongst clinicians, patients and policy makers. The inability to identify an underlying pathology makes it difficult to devise effective treatments for this condition. Couples with unexplained infertility can conceive on their own and any proposed intervention needs to offer a better chance of having a baby. Over the years, several prognostic and prediction models based on routinely collected clinical data have been developed, but these are not widely used by clinicians and patients. In this opinion paper, we propose a prognosis-based approach such that a decision to access treatment is based on the estimated chances of natural and treatment-related conception, which, in the same couple, can change over time. This approach avoids treating all couples as a homogeneous group and minimizes unnecessary treatment whilst ensuring access to those who need it early.
Keywords: assisted conception; expectant management; live birth; prediction models; spontaneous pregnancy; treatment; unexplained infertility.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
References
-
- Bensdorp AJ, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Habbema JDF, Hompes PGA, Bossuyt PMM, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Eijkemans MJC; CECERM Study Group. A revised prediction model for natural conception. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34:619–626. - PubMed
-
- Bostofte E, Bagger P, Michael A, Stakemann G.. Fertility prognosis for infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1993;59:102–107. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources