Possible Association between the Quantity of Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid, Clinical Indices, and the Dimensions of Endosseous Implants
- PMID: 36382013
- PMCID: PMC9617251
- DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13303
Possible Association between the Quantity of Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid, Clinical Indices, and the Dimensions of Endosseous Implants
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this clinical observational study are to measure peri-implant crevicular fluid volume based on dental implant diameter and length, and to evaluate the possible relationship between peri-implant crevicular fluid/gingival crevicular fluid volumes and clinical periodontal indices.
Material and methods: The information about length and diameter of dental implants was noted. Clinical indices (probing depth, plaque index, gingival bleeding time index, and gingival index) were recorded. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF)/gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volumes were measured from 4 sites (mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual/palatal) of each dental implant including its one or more equivalent natural tooth/teeth.
Results: One-hundred-sixty-one loaded dental implants and 221 natural teeth of 101 patients were evaluated. The length of dental implant had no effect on PICF volume (P > 0.05). However, PICF volumes of narrow (< 3.5 mm) and wide (> 4.5 mm) diameter implants were higher than standard diameter implants (≥ 3.5 mm, and ≤ 4.5 mm) (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes of areas with peri-implant/periodontal diseases were significantly higher than healthy areas (P < 0.05). PICF and GCF volumes showed positive correlations with clinical indices (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: In accordance with the results of the present study, the implant diameter, not the implant length, affects peri-implant crevicular fluid volume.
Keywords: dental implants; diagnosis; gingival crevicular fluid; inflammation.
Copyright © Duruel O, Goyushov S, Yakar N, Güncü GN, Karabulut E, Tözüm TF. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 30 September 2022.
Similar articles
-
Longitudinal comparison of cytokines in peri-implant fluid and gingival crevicular fluid in healthy mouths.J Periodontol. 2014 Nov;85(11):1582-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130642. Epub 2014 May 16. J Periodontol. 2014. PMID: 24835419
-
Inflammatory cytokine profiles in the crevicular fluid around clinically healthy dental implants compared to the healthy contralateral side during the early stages of implant function.Arch Oral Biol. 2019 Dec;108:104509. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104509. Epub 2019 Jul 29. Arch Oral Biol. 2019. PMID: 31494437
-
Evaluation of gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of sclerostin, TWEAK, RANKL and OPG.Cytokine. 2019 Jan;113:433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Oct 28. Cytokine. 2019. PMID: 30377055
-
A review on peri-implant crevicular fluid assays potential in monitoring and predicting peri-implant tissue responses.J Int Acad Periodontol. 2002 Apr;4(2):49-59. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2002. PMID: 12685808 Review.
-
Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis and Prognosis Using Biomarkers in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Dec 7;9(4):214. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040214. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31817894 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic potential of endothelin-1 in peri-implant diseases: a cross-sectional study.Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jun 14;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00551-0. Int J Implant Dent. 2024. PMID: 38874661 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of endothelin-1 and interleukin-1β as a biomarker for diagnosing peri-implant disorders.Bioinformation. 2024 Sep 30;20(9):1148-1153. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001148. eCollection 2024. Bioinformation. 2024. PMID: 39917223 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Albrektson T, Isidor F. Consensus Report: Implant therapy. In: Lang NP, Karring T. editors. Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessence; 1994. p. 365-9.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources