Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 16;24(11):e35974.
doi: 10.2196/35974.

Consumer-Generated Discourse on Cannabis as a Medicine: Scoping Review of Techniques

Affiliations

Consumer-Generated Discourse on Cannabis as a Medicine: Scoping Review of Techniques

Sedigheh Khademi Habibabadi et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Medicinal cannabis is increasingly being used for a variety of physical and mental health conditions. Social media and web-based health platforms provide valuable, real-time, and cost-effective surveillance resources for gleaning insights regarding individuals who use cannabis for medicinal purposes. This is particularly important considering that the evidence for the optimal use of medicinal cannabis is still emerging. Despite the web-based marketing of medicinal cannabis to consumers, currently, there is no robust regulatory framework to measure clinical health benefits or individual experiences of adverse events. In a previous study, we conducted a systematic scoping review of studies that contained themes of the medicinal use of cannabis and used data from social media and search engine results. This study analyzed the methodological approaches and limitations of these studies.

Objective: We aimed to examine research approaches and study methodologies that use web-based user-generated text to study the use of cannabis as a medicine.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases for primary studies in the English language from January 1974 to April 2022. Studies were included if they aimed to understand web-based user-generated text related to health conditions where cannabis is used as a medicine or where health was mentioned in general cannabis-related conversations.

Results: We included 42 articles in this review. In these articles, Twitter was used 3 times more than other computer-generated sources, including Reddit, web-based forums, GoFundMe, YouTube, and Google Trends. Analytical methods included sentiment assessment, thematic analysis (manual and automatic), social network analysis, and geographic analysis.

Conclusions: This study is the first to review techniques used by research on consumer-generated text for understanding cannabis as a medicine. It is increasingly evident that consumer-generated data offer opportunities for a greater understanding of individual behavior and population health outcomes. However, research using these data has some limitations that include difficulties in establishing sample representativeness and a lack of methodological best practices. To address these limitations, deidentified annotated data sources should be made publicly available, researchers should determine the origins of posts (organizations, bots, power users, or ordinary individuals), and powerful analytical techniques should be used.

Keywords: consumer-generated data; data mining; internet and the web technology; medical marijuana; medicinal cannabis; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the study selection process [20].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li HL. An archaeological and historical account of cannabis in China. Econ Bot. 1973 Oct;28(4):437–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02862859. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4253540 - DOI
    1. Hallinan CM, Gunn JM, Bonomo YA. Implementation of medicinal cannabis in Australia: innovation or upheaval? Perspectives from physicians as key informants, a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 22;11(10):e054044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054044. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=34686558 bmjopen-2021-054044 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee S, McCormack S. Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019. - PubMed
    1. Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Dennis DA, Jennings JM. Medicinal cannabis in orthopaedic practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 May 01;28(7):268–77. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00438. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pawliuk C, Chau B, Rassekh SR, McKellar T, Siden HH. Efficacy and safety of paediatric medicinal cannabis use: a scoping review. Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Jul;26(4):228–33. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa031. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34131459 pxaa031 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances