Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 8;11(4):267-274.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729742. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Comparison of Intermittent versus Continuous Superior Venal Caval Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Early Goal Directed Therapy in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of Intermittent versus Continuous Superior Venal Caval Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Early Goal Directed Therapy in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

Jhuma Mondal Sankar et al. J Pediatr Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Early goal directed therapy (EGDT) is a bundle of care (monitoring ScvO 2 and lactate along with clinical parameters and instituting therapy) that has shown to improve outcomes in patients with septic shock. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies to compare intermittent versus continuous monitoring of ScvO 2 . We did major database searches till August 2020. Hospitalized children (>2 months age) and adults with septic shock were included. The intervention was "intermittent ScvO 2 monitoring," and the comparator was "continuous ScvO 2 monitoring." The primary outcome is "all-cause mortality." Of 564 citations, 3 studies ( n = 541) including both children and adults were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the "overall/all-cause mortality" (two randomized controlled trials; 258 participants) between the "intermittent" and "continuous" ScvO 2 monitoring groups (relative risk [RR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.24). However, a single observational study (283 participants) showed a significant increase in mortality in the intermittent group (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.03-2.05). The GRADE evidence generated for "overall/all-cause mortality" was of "moderate certainty." To conclude, the present meta-analysis did not find any significant difference between "intermittent" and "continuous" ScvO 2 monitoring in patients with septic shock.

Keywords: ScvO 2 monitoring; goal directed therapy; mortality; sepsis; septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall/all-cause mortality.

References

    1. Jaramillo-Bustamante J C, Marín-Agudelo A, Fernández-Laverde M, Bareño-Silva J. Epidemiology of sepsis in pediatric intensive care units: first Colombian multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(05):501–508. - PubMed
    1. Sankar J, Dhochak N, Kumar K, Singh M, Sankar M J, Lodha R. Comparison of International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference Versus Sepsis-3 Definitions for Children Presenting with Septic Shock to a Tertiary Care Center in India: a retrospective study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(03):e122–e129. - PubMed
    1. Hartman M E, Linde-Zwirble W T, Angus D C, Watson R S. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(07):686–693. - PubMed
    1. Sepsis Prevalence, Outcomes, and Therapies (SPROUT) Study Investigators and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network . Weiss S L, Fitzgerald J C, Pappachan J. Global epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis: the sepsis prevalence, outcomes, and therapies study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(10):1147–1157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes & Resource Evaluation (CORE) and Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group . Schlapbach L J, MacLaren G, Festa M. Prediction of pediatric sepsis mortality within 1 h of intensive care admission. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(08):1085–1096. - PubMed