Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28:10:1010702.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010702. eCollection 2022.

Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings: The case of Malawi

Affiliations

Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings: The case of Malawi

Francesco Ramponi et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) offers a set of analytical tools to support health systems' decisions about resource allocation. Although there is increasing interest in these tools across the world, including in some middle-income countries, they remain rarely used in low-income countries (LICs). In general, the focus of HTA is narrow, mostly limited to assessments of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. However, the principles of HTA can be used to support a broader series of decisions regarding new health technologies. We examine the potential for this broad use of HTA in LICs, with a focus on Malawi. We develop a framework to classify the main decisions on health technologies within health systems. The framework covers decisions on identifying and prioritizing technologies for detailed assessment, deciding whether to adopt an intervention, assessing alternative investments for implementation and scale-up, and undertaking further research activities. We consider the relevance of the framework to policymakers in Malawi and we use two health technologies as examples to investigate the main barriers and enablers to the use of HTA methods. Although the scarcity of local data, expertise, and other resources could risk limiting the operationalisation of HTA in LICs, we argue that even in highly resource constrained health systems, such as in Malawi, the use of HTA to support a broad range of decisions is feasible and desirable.

Keywords: Malawi; health technology assessment (HTA); healthcare decision making; low- and middle-income countries; resource allocation in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Kriza C, Hanass-Hancock J, Odame EA, Deghaye N, Aman R, Wahlster P, et al. . A systematic review of health technology assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications. Health Res Policy Syst. (2014) 12:66. 10.1186/1478-4505-12-66 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kapiriri L, Baltussen R, Oortwijn W. Implementing evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment: a low income country perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2020) 36:29–33. 10.1017/S0266462319003398 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pichon-Riviere A, Augustovski F, Garcia Marti S, Alfie V, Sampietro-Colom L. The link between health technology assessment and decision making for the allocation of health resources in Latin America. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2020) 36:173–8. 10.1017/S0266462320000033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doherty JE, Wilkinson T, Edoka I, Hofman K. Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Glob Health Action. (2017) 10:1370194. 10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castro HE, Kumar R, Suharlim C. A Roadmap for Systematic Priority Setting and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Arlington, VA: USAID/MSH. (2020).

Publication types