Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar:2022:10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761579.
doi: 10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761579. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Ideal-Observer Computation with anthropomorphic phantoms using Markov chain Monte Carlo

Affiliations

Ideal-Observer Computation with anthropomorphic phantoms using Markov chain Monte Carlo

Md Ashequr Rahman et al. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

In medical imaging, it is widely recognized that image quality should be objectively evaluated based on performance in clinical tasks. To evaluate performance in signal-detection tasks, the ideal observer (IO) is optimal but also challenging to compute in clinically realistic settings. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based strategies have demonstrated the ability to compute the IO using pre-computed projections of an anatomical database. To evaluate image quality in clinically realistic scenarios, the observer performance should be measured for a realistic patient distribution. This implies that the anatomical database should also be derived from a realistic population. In this manuscript, we propose to advance the MCMC-based approach towards achieving these goals. We then use the proposed approach to study the effect of anatomical database size on IO computation for the task of detecting perfusion defects in simulated myocardial perfusion SPECT images. Our preliminary results provide evidence that the size of the anatomical database affects the computation of the IO.

Keywords: Image-quality evaluation; Markov chain Monte Carlo; SPECT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(a) The estimate of IO test statistics as a function of total number iterations used for MCMC simulation. (b) The distribution of block estimate of log of IO test statistic.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(a) Λ^|H0 and (b) Λ^|H1varΛ^|H0 as a function of number of image pairs used for observer study.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
AUC values as a function of size of anatomical database. The error bar indicates 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barrett Harrison H, Myers Kyle J, Hoeschen Christoph, Kupinski Matthew A, and Little Mark P, “Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk,” Phys. Med. Biol, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. R1, 2015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett Harrison H, Yao Jie, Rolland Jannick P, and Myers Kyle J, “Model observers for assessment of image quality,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 21, pp. 9758–9765, 1993. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett Harrison H, Abbey Craig K, and Clarkson Eric, “Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions,” JOSA A, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1520–1535, 1998. - PubMed
    1. Jha Abhinav K, Myers Kyle J, Obuchowski Nancy A, Liu Ziping, Rahman Md Ashequr, Saboury Babak, Rahmim Arman, and Siegel Barry A, “Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Imaging Methods:: Framework, Strategies, and Role of the Physician,” PET clinics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 493–511, 2021. - PubMed
    1. Clarkson Eric and Shen Fangfang, “Fisher information and surrogate figures of merit for the task-based assessment of image quality,” JOSA A, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2313–2326, 2010. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources