Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 25:13:981280.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981280. eCollection 2022.

The impact of a terrorist attack: Survivors' health, functioning and need for support following the 2019 Utrecht tram shooting 6 and 18 months post-attack

Mark W G Bosmans  1 , Carolien Plevier  2 , Francoise Schutz  2 , Lise E Stene  3 , C Joris Yzermans  1 , Michel L A Dückers  1   4   5
Affiliations

The impact of a terrorist attack: Survivors' health, functioning and need for support following the 2019 Utrecht tram shooting 6 and 18 months post-attack

Mark W G Bosmans et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Extremely violent events such as terrorist attacks and mass shootings form a severe risk for the health and wellbeing of affected individuals. In this study based on a public health monitor, we focus on the health impact (including PTSD symptoms, physical problems and day-to-day functioning) of the Utrecht tram shooting, which took place in the morning of March 18th 2019. A lone gunman opened fire on passengers within a moving tram. Four people died, and six people were injured in this attack. The attack resulted in nationwide commotion and drew much media attention. Aim of this study was to increase insight into the health effects for the survivors (those directly impacted by a terrorist attack and the bereaved), and whether they received the needed care and support.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with accompanying questionnaires were conducted at six and 18 months post-attack. Overall, 21 survivors (victims/witnesses and loved ones of deceased victims) participated in the first series of interviews, 15 in the second series. Qualitative data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, quantitative data was only described because of the low sample size.

Results: At both six and 18 months after the attack many survivors had been able to resume daily life, and most rated their overall health as (very) good or excellent. At the same time, a substantial portion suffered from health problems such as posttraumatic stress symptoms and other complaints, and needed professional care. Furthermore, those in need did not always find their own way to appropriate care through the existing health system: half of the survivors still needed support in finding the right care 18 months later.

Conclusion: Although the design and implementation of this public health monitor were accompanied by multiple challenges, it was possible to track a portion of the survivors and gain insight in the considerable health burden of the attack. Also, it is clear in this study that the health impact of terrorism affects survivors in the long run and requires attention from health authorities and professionals, as survivors were not able to find the right care by themselves.

Keywords: PTSD; care utilization; health impact; health monitoring; long term; qualitative; survivors; terrorism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study enrollment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beck J. G., Grant D. M., Read J. P., Clapp J. D., Coffey S. F., Miller L. M., et al. (2008). The impact of event scale–revised: psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors. J. Anxiety Disord. 22, 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.007, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisson J. I., Tavakoly B., Witteveen A. B., Adjukovic D., Jehel L., Johansen V. J., et al. (2010). TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process. Br. J. Psychiatry 196, 69–74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066266, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boelen P. A., Olff M., Smid G. E. (2019). Traumatic loss: mental health consequences and implications for treatment and prevention. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 10:1591331. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1591331, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonanno G. A., Brewin C. R., Kaniasty K., Greca A. M. L. (2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 11, 1–49. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387086, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonanno G. A., Mancini A. D. (2012). Beyond resilience and PTSD: mapping the heterogeneity of responses to potential trauma. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 4, 74–83. doi: 10.1037/a0017829 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources