Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:170:107556.
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107556. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

Update of the WHO global air quality guidelines: Systematic reviews - An introduction

Román Pérez Velasco  1 , Dorota Jarosińska  2
Affiliations

Update of the WHO global air quality guidelines: Systematic reviews - An introduction

Román Pérez Velasco et al. Environ Int. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

This paper aims to serve as an introduction to the Special Issue in Environment International entitled "Update of the WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Systematic Reviews". The article has two main objectives. One is to provide the context to this Special Issue, related to (a) policy context, overall exposure to air pollution, and burden of disease attributable to air pollution, and the other is to describe (b) the WHO guideline development process, with special emphasis on the systematic reviews. In particular, this paper presents the systematic reviews and other supporting evidence that was used and discussed during the process and summarizes important methodological information about the approaches taken to conduct the systematic reviews. These approaches include the definition of population, exposure, comparator, outcomes and study design (PECOS) questions, the assessment of the risk of bias in individual studies and the assessment of the overall certainty of the evidence. In summary, the new WHO global air quality guidelines are informed by the best available scientific evidence covering a vast number of research papers published until September 2018, and appraised by experts and stakeholders in the field of air quality. However, research gaps remain and, therefore, further research is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Awe, Y., Hagler, G., Kleiman, G., Klopp, J., Pinder, R., Terry, S., 2017. Filling the gaps: Improving measurement of ambient air quality in low and middle income countries. White paper. Discussion draft.
    1. Balshem H., Helfand M., Schünemann H.J., Oxman A.D., Kunz R., Brozek J., Vist G.E., Falck-Ytter Y., Meerpohl J., Norris S., Guyatt G.H. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bazyar J., Pourvakhshoori N., Khankeh H., Farrokhi M., Delshad V., Rajabi E. A comprehensive evaluation of the association between ambient air pollution and adverse health outcomes of major organ systems: a systematic review with a worldwide approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26:12648–12661. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04874-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell-Lendrum D., Prüss-Ustün A. Climate change, air pollution and noncommunicable diseases. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019;97:160–161. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.224295. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J., Hoek G. Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020;143 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974. (this issue) - DOI - PubMed