Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Mar 2;61(3):2201426.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01426-2022. Print 2023 Mar.

Effects of intubation timing in patients with COVID-19 throughout the four waves of the pandemic: a matched analysis

Jordi Riera  1   2   3 Enric Barbeta  2   4   5   3 Adrián Tormos  6 Ricard Mellado-Artigas  2   4 Adrián Ceccato  7   8 Anna Motos  2   5 Laia Fernández-Barat  2   5 Ricard Ferrer  1 Darío García-Gasulla  6 Oscar Peñuelas  9 José Ángel Lorente  9 Rosario Menéndez  10 Oriol Roca  1   2 Andrea Palomeque  5   11 Carlos Ferrando  2   4 Jordi Solé-Violán  12 Mariana Novo  13 María Victoria Boado  14 Luis Tamayo  15 Ángel Estella  16 Cristóbal Galban  17 Josep Trenado  18 Arturo Huerta  19 Ana Loza  20 Luciano Aguilera  21 José Luís García Garmendia  22 Carme Barberà  23 Víctor Gumucio  24   25 Lorenzo Socias  26 Nieves Franco  27 Luis Jorge Valdivia  28 Pablo Vidal  29 Víctor Sagredo  30 Ángela Leonor Ruiz-García  31 Ignacio Martínez Varela  32 Juan López  33 Juan Carlos Pozo  34 Maite Nieto  35 José M Gómez  36 Aaron Blandino  37 Manuel Valledor  38 Elena Bustamante-Munguira  39 Ángel Sánchez-Miralles  40 Yhivian Peñasco  41 José Barberán  42 Alejandro Ubeda  43 Rosario Amaya-Villar  44 María Cruz Martín  45 Ruth Jorge  46 Jesús Caballero  47 Judith Marin  48 José Manuel Añón  49 Fernando Suárez Sipmann  50 Guillermo M Albaiceta  2   51 Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega  52 Berta Adell-Serrano  53 Mercedes Catalán  54 Amalia Martínez de la Gándara  55 Pilar Ricart  56 Cristina Carbajales  57 Alejandro Rodríguez  58 Emili Díaz  7   8 Mari C de la Torre  59 Elena Gallego  60 Luisa Cantón-Bulnes  61 Nieves Carbonell  62 Jessica González  63 David de Gonzalo-Calvo  2   63 Ferran Barbé  2   63 Antoni Torres  64   5   11 CIBERESUCICOVID Consortium
Affiliations
Observational Study

Effects of intubation timing in patients with COVID-19 throughout the four waves of the pandemic: a matched analysis

Jordi Riera et al. Eur Respir J. .

Abstract

Background: The primary aim of our study was to investigate the association between intubation timing and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated respiratory failure. We also analysed both the impact of such timing throughout the first four pandemic waves and the influence of prior noninvasive respiratory support on outcomes.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, observational and prospective cohort study that included all consecutive patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 from across 58 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) participating in the CIBERESUCICOVID project. The study period was between 29 February 2020 and 31 August 2021. Early intubation was defined as that occurring within the first 24 h of ICU admission. Propensity score matching was used to achieve a balance across baseline variables between the early intubation cohort and those patients who were intubated after the first 24 h of ICU admission. Differences in outcomes between early and delayed intubation were also assessed. We performed sensitivity analyses to consider a different time-point (48 h from ICU admission) for early and delayed intubation.

Results: Of the 2725 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation, a total of 614 matched patients were included in the analysis (307 for each group). In the unmatched population, there were no differences in mortality between the early and delayed groups. After propensity score matching, patients with delayed intubation presented higher hospital mortality (27.3% versus 37.1%; p=0.01), ICU mortality (25.7% versus 36.1%; p=0.007) and 90-day mortality (30.9% versus 40.2%; p=0.02) compared with the early intubation group. Very similar findings were observed when we used a 48-h time-point for early or delayed intubation. The use of early intubation decreased after the first wave of the pandemic (72%, 49%, 46% and 45% in the first, second, third and fourth waves, respectively; first versus second, third and fourth waves p<0.001). In both the main and sensitivity analyses, hospital mortality was lower in patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (n=294) who were intubated earlier. The subgroup of patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation (n=214) before intubation showed higher mortality when delayed intubation was set as that occurring after 48 h from ICU admission, but not when after 24 h.

Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, delayed intubation was associated with a higher risk of hospital mortality. The use of early intubation significantly decreased throughout the course of the pandemic. Benefits of such an approach occurred more notably in patients who had received HFNC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: O. Roca discloses a research grant from Hamilton Medical AG; speaker fees from Hamilton Medical AG, Ambu, Fisher & Paykel Ltd and Aerogen Ltd; and nonfinancial research support from Timpel and Masimo. R. Mellado-Artigas reports speaker fees from Medtronic and Fisher & Paykel, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flowchart. Inclusion period was from 29 February 2020 to 31 August 2021. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed with the following variables: sex, age, respiratory rate at hospital admission, arterial oxygen tension/inspiratory oxygen fraction at hospital admission (categorised as >300, 200– ≤300, 100– ≤200 or ≤100 mmHg), time from hospital admission to intensive care unit (ICU) admission (categorised as ≤2 or >2 days), immunodepression, corticosteroid treatment and COVID-19 wave. ETI: endotracheal intubation; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Survival curves for the a) overall cohort and b) adjusted population, as obtained by propensity score matching. In total, 81 out of 614 (13.19%) patients were transferred to another hospital and censored from the survival analysis. ETI: endotracheal intubation.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Proportion of patients with COVID-19 intubated ≤24, >24–48, >48–72 or >72 h since intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the first, second, third and fourth waves in Spain. Proportion of patients intubated ≤24 h since ICU admission in the first, second, third and fourth waves: first versus second, third and fourth waves p<0.001.

References

    1. Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA 2020; 323: 2329–2330. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6825 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. P-SILI is not justification for intubation of COVID-19 patients. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 105. doi:10.1186/s13613-020-00724-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 78. doi:10.1186/s13613-020-00692-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, et al. . The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 536–545. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711972 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang BJ, Koh Y, Lim CM, et al. . Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 623–632. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3693-5 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types