Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 17;12(1):485.
doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02256-7.

Heterogeneity in treatment outcomes and incomplete recovery in first episode psychosis: does one size fit all?

Affiliations
Review

Heterogeneity in treatment outcomes and incomplete recovery in first episode psychosis: does one size fit all?

Siân Lowri Griffiths et al. Transl Psychiatry. .

Abstract

The heterogeneity in recovery outcomes for individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) calls for a strong evidence base to inform practice at an individual level. Between 19-89% of young people with FEP have an incomplete recovery despite gold-standard evidence-based treatments, suggesting current service models, which adopt a 'one-size fits all' approach, may not be addressing the needs of many young people with psychosis. The lack of consistent terminology to define key concepts such as recovery and treatment resistance, the multidimensional nature of these concepts, and common comorbid symptoms are some of the challenges faced by the field in delineating heterogeneity in recovery outcomes. The lack of robust markers for incomplete recovery also results in potential delay in delivering prompt, and effective treatments to individuals at greatest risk. There is a clear need to adopt a stratified approach to care where interventions are targeted at subgroups of patients, and ultimately at the individual level. Novel machine learning, using large, representative data from a range of modalities, may aid in the parsing of heterogeneity, and provide greater precision and sophistication in identifying those on a pathway to incomplete recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report the following conflicts of interest: RU and SJW report grants from Medical Research Council, European Commission—Research: The Seventh Framework Programme, and National Institute for Health Research. SJW also has grants from National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the Medical Research Future Fund. Outside of the submitted work, RU has personal fees from Sunovion, and SJW has personal fees from Biogen.

References

    1. Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A, Krivko A, Bonetto C, Ruggeri M, et al. Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:555–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birchwood M, Todd P, Jackson C. Early intervention in psychosis: the critical period hypothesis. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172:53–9. - PubMed
    1. Birchwood M, MacMillan F. Early intervention in schizophrenia. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 1993;27:374–8. - PubMed
    1. Leighton SP, Upthegrove R, Krishnadas R, Benros ME, Broome MR, Gkoutos GV, et al. Development and validation of multivariable prediction models of remission, recovery, and quality of life outcomes in people with first episode psychosis: a machine learning approach. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e261–e70.. - PubMed
    1. Hodgekins J, French P, Birchwood M, Mugford M, Christopher R, Marshall M, et al. Comparing time use in individuals at different stages of psychosis and a non-clinical comparison group. Schizophr Res. 2015;161:188–93. - PubMed