Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 18;17(11):e0277986.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277986. eCollection 2022.

Multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals' perceptions of current and optimal acute rehabilitation, a hip fracture example A UK qualitative interview study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework

Affiliations

Multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals' perceptions of current and optimal acute rehabilitation, a hip fracture example A UK qualitative interview study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework

Stefanny Guerra et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To understand multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals' perceptions of current and optimal provision of acute rehabilitation, perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation, and their implications for patient recovery, using hip fracture as an example.

Methods: A qualitative design was adopted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 members of the acute multidisciplinary healthcare team (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, physicians, nurses) working on orthopaedic wards at 15 different hospitals across the UK. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and then thematically analysed drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework to enhance our understanding of the findings.

Results: We identified four themes: conceptualising a model of rehabilitative practice, which reflected the perceived variability of rehabilitation models, along with facilitators and common patient and organisational barriers for optimal rehabilitation; competing professional and organisational goals, which highlighted the reported incompatibility between organisational goals and person-centred care shaping rehabilitation practices, particularly for more vulnerable patients; engaging teams in collaborative practice, which related to the expressed need to work well with all members of the multidisciplinary team to achieve the same person-centred goals and share rehabilitation practices; and engaging patients and their carers, highlighting the importance of their involvement to achieve a holistic and collaborative approach to rehabilitation in the acute setting. Barriers and facilitators within themes were underpinned by the lack or presence of adequate ways of communicating with patients, carers, and multidisciplinary team members; resources (e.g. equipment, staffing, group classes), and support from people in leadership positions such as management and senior staff.

Conclusions: Cornerstones of optimal acute rehabilitation are effective communication and collaborative practices between the multidisciplinary team, patients and carers. Supportive management and leadership are central to optimise these processes. Organisational constraints are the most commonly perceived barrier to delivering effective rehabilitation in hospital settings, which exacerbate silo working and limited patient engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship funding [Grant Ref: MR/S032819/1] provides salary support for KS and SG. KS is the Chair of the Scientific and Publications Committee of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme which managed the National Hip Fracture Database audit at the Royal College of Physicians. ES is supported by NIHR ARC Wessex. GM and KL declare no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials (though there are restrictions in place for data sharing, as participants did not consent to share or archive their anonymised dataset publicly).

References

    1. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in Health Systems. World Health Organization; [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2021 Nov 30];92. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254506
    1. England NHS. Commissioning Guidance For Rehabilitation. 2016. [cited 2021 Nov 30];(04919):159. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/commissioning-guidance-for-rehabi...
    1. Morris JH, Bernhardsson S, Bird ML, Connell L, Lynch E, Jarvis K, et al.. Implementation in rehabilitation: a roadmap for practitioners and researchers. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2020. Oct 22 [cited 2021 Dec 8];42(22):3265–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30978129/ doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. NHS. NHS Long Term Plan [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/online-version/
    1. NHS Benchmarking Network. National Audit of Intermediate Care Report [Internet]. Manchester; 2013. Available from: https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/national-audit-of-intermediate-...

Publication types