Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1:241:109682.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109682. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

Do alcohol control policies have the predicted effects on consumption? An analysis of the Baltic countries and Poland 2000-2020

Affiliations

Do alcohol control policies have the predicted effects on consumption? An analysis of the Baltic countries and Poland 2000-2020

Jürgen Rehm et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: Many population-based alcohol control policies are postulated to work via changes in adult alcohol per capita consumption (APC). However, since APC is usually assessed on a yearly basis, often there are not enough data to conduct interrupted time-series or other controlled analyses. The current dataset, with 21 years of observation from four countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland), had sufficient power to test for average effects and potential interactions of the World Health Organization's (WHO) three "best buys" for alcohol control: taxation increases leading to a decrease in affordability; reduced availability (via a decrease in opening hours of at least 20 %); and advertising and marketing restrictions. We postulated that the former two would have immediate effects, while the latter would have mid- to long-term effects.

Methods: Linear regression analysis.

Results: Taxation increases and availability reductions in all countries were associated with an average reduction in APC of 0.83 litres (ℓ) of pure alcohol per year (95 % confidence interval: -1.21 ℓ, -0.41 ℓ) in the same year, with no significant differences between countries. Restrictions on advertising and/or marketing had no significant immediate associations with APC (average effect 0.04 ℓ per year; 95 % confidence interval: -0.65 ℓ, 0.73 ℓ). Several sensitivity analyses corroborated these main results.

Conclusions: The WHO "best buy" alcohol control policies of taxation increases and availability restrictions worked as postulated in these four northeastern European Union countries.

Keywords: Affordability; Alcohol control policy; Alcohol per capita consumption; Availability; Best buys; Marketing ban; Taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest No conflict declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Trends in total adult (aged 15+) alcohol per capita consumption in the Baltic countries and Poland, and taxation increases or availability restrictions in 2000–2020 Note: Vertical lines indicate the year when policies were enacted. If more than one country had an alcohol control policy in the same year, different colors were used for the vertical lines matching the country colour. Asterisk (‘*’) represents taxation policies, addition sign (‘+’) represents availability policies, and red ‘X’ represents loosening of taxation policies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics2022 22/June/2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/publications/world-health-statistics.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Information System on Alcohol and Health (GISAH) Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/global-information-system-on-al.... 22/06/2022.
    1. Rehm J, Štelemėkas M, Kim KV, Zafar A, Lange S. Alcohol and health in Central and Eastern European Union countries–status quo and alcohol policy options. Journal of health inequalities. 2021;7(2):91–5. 10.5114/jhi.2021.113167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Štelemėkas M, Ferreira-Borges C, Jiang H, Lange S, Neufeld M, et al. Classifying alcohol control policies with respect to expected changes in consumption and alcohol-attributable harm: the example of Lithuania, 2000–2019. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(5):2419. 10.3390/ijerph18052419 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Štelemėkas M, Badaras R. Research protocol to evaluate the effects of alcohol policy changes in Lithuania. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2019;54(1):112–8. 10.1093/alcalc/agy068 - DOI - PubMed