Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study
- PMID: 36403008
- PMCID: PMC9675960
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08764-y
Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Contact tracing (CT) is an important, but resource-intensive tool to control outbreaks of communicable diseases. Under pandemic circumstances, public health services may not have sufficient resources at their disposal to effectively facilitate CT. This may be addressed by giving cases and their contact persons more autonomy and responsibility in the execution of CT by public health professionals, through digital contact tracing support tools (DCTS-tools). However, the application of this approach has not yet been systematically investigated from the perspective of public health practice. Therefore, we investigated public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding involving cases and contact persons in CT for COVID-19 through DCTS-tools.
Methods: Between October 2020 and February 2021, we conducted online semi-structured interviews (N = 17) with Dutch public health professionals to explore their perspectives and needs regarding the involvement of cases and contact persons in CT for COVID-19 through DCTS-tools, in the contact identification, notification, and monitoring stages of the CT-process. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed.
Results: Four main themes related to Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding involving cases and contact persons in CT for COVID-19 through DCTS-tools emerged from the data: 'Distinct characteristics of CT with DCTS-tools'; 'Anticipated benefits and challenges of CT for COVID-19 with DCTS- tools'; 'Circumstances in CT for COVID-19 that permit or constrain the application of DCTS-tools'; and 'Public health professionals' needs regarding the development and application of DCTS-tools for CT'. Public health professionals seem to have a positive attitude towards involving cases and contact persons through DCTS-tools. Public health professionals' (positive) attitudes seem conditional on the circumstances under which CT is performed, and the fulfilment of their needs in the development and application of DCTS-tools.
Conclusions: Dutch public health professionals seem positive towards involving cases and contact persons in CT for COVID-19 through DCTS-tools. Through adequate implementation of DCTS-tools in the CT-process, anticipated challenges can be overcome. Future research should investigate the perspectives and needs of cases and contact persons regarding DCTS-tools, and the application of DCTS-tools in practice.
Keywords: COVID-19; Contact tracing; Healthcare delivery; Healthcare professionals; Patient participation; Qualitative research; eHealth.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37716982 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38354119 Free PMC article.
-
Online respondent-driven detection for enhanced contact tracing of close-contact infectious diseases: benefits and barriers for public health practice.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06052-4. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33863279 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences with the implementation of remote monitoring in patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study with patients and healthcare professionals.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):67-78. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12814. Epub 2022 Sep 27. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023. PMID: 36165577 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Resilience perspective on healthcare professionals' adaptations to changes and challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-synthesis.BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e071828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071828. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37730402 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37716982 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38354119 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 38019583 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Citizens' Intention to Participate in Self-Led Contact Tracing: Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 30;10:e56943. doi: 10.2196/56943. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39476390 Free PMC article.
References
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Contact tracing in the European Union: public health management of persons, including healthcare workers, who have had contact with COVID-19 cases – fourth update. 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/TGU-20211019-18.... Accessed 15 Apr 2022.
-
- Yalaman A, Basbug G, Elgin C, Galvani AP. Cross-country evidence on the association between contact tracing and COVID-19 case fatality rates. Sci Reports. 2021;11(1):1–6 Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78760-x. Accessed 15 Apr 2022. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kretzschmar ME, Rozhnova G, van Boven M. Isolation and contact tracing can tip the scale to containment of COVID-19 in populations with social distancing. Front Phys. 2021;8:677. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.622485. - DOI
-
- Kretzschmar ME, Rozhnova G, Bootsma MCJ, van Boven M, van de Wijgert JHHM, Bonten MJM. Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study. Lancet Public Heal. 2020;5(8):e452–9. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468266720301572/fulltext. Accessed 15 Apr 2022. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Davis EL, Lucas TCD, Borlase A, Pollington TM, Abbott S, Ayabina D, et al. Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–8 Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25531-5. Accessed 15 Apr 2022. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical